Abstract. Understanding Generation Z's political preferences is essential for candidates who engage this influential demographic in the 2025 Philippine Senate elections. Despite the growing importance of Gen Z in the electorate, limited research exists on the specific candidate attributes that shape their voting decisions. This study, conducted in Davao City, addresses this gap by examining how Gen Z perceives various candidate attributes through the lens of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) and Rational Choice Theory (RCT). Using conjoint analysis with the PAPRIKA method, the study evaluated the relative importance of six key attributes: political experience, educational background, stance on issues, party affiliation, campaign style, and age group. Data from 1,380 respondents were analyzed to ensure a robust representation of Gen Z preferences. Results reveal that political experience (31.0%) and educational background (18.1%) are the most influential factors, followed by stance on issues (17.2%) and party affiliation (15.8%), with campaign-style (10.8%) and age group (7.2%) being less significant. Gen Z voters in this study preferred candidates with substantial experience, advanced academic credentials, and a progressive stance on social and environmental issues, favoring digital over traditional campaign strategies. These findings have theoretical and practical implications, enriching the understanding of Gen Z's decision-making processes and highlighting their prioritization of competence, authenticity, and modern communication. Politicians can use these insights to develop targeted campaign strategies that resonate with Gen Z values, emphasizing progressive policies, qualifications, and digital engagement. By aligning campaign approaches with Gen Z's expectations, candidates have a strategic opportunity to connect meaningfully with this emerging voting bloc in the Philippine political landscape.

Keywords: Conjoint analysis; Electoral preferences; Generation Z; PAPRIKA method; Political marketing