English Teachers Handling Other Subjects: A Phenomenological Study

Authors

  • Michael B. Garcia School of Advanced Studies, Pangasinan State University, Urdaneta City, Pangasinan, Philippines
  • Trisha L. Asuncion School of Advanced Studies, Pangasinan State University, Urdaneta City, Pangasinan, Philippines
  • Jenika S. Advincula School of Advanced Studies, Pangasinan State University, Urdaneta City, Pangasinan, Philippines
  • Lloyd M. Fernandez School of Advanced Studies, Pangasinan State University, Urdaneta City, Pangasinan, Philippines
  • Daniela Alexis M. Gueta School of Advanced Studies, Pangasinan State University, Urdaneta City, Pangasinan, Philippines
  • Deborah Ruth G. Javier School of Advanced Studies, Pangasinan State University, Urdaneta City, Pangasinan, Philippines
  • , Jayson C. Julaton School of Advanced Studies, Pangasinan State University, Urdaneta City, Pangasinan, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0681

Keywords:

English teachers, Instructional practices, Mismatch, Phenomenology, Professional growth

Abstract

This phenomenological qualitative research study explored the lived experiences of English teachers in Urdaneta City who were assigned to teach non-English subjects. Using the census sampling method, all four English teachers handling out-of-field assignments participated in semi-structured interviews. The study aimed to examine the challenges encountered, instructional adjustments, strategies developed, and the effects of these assignments on their professional growth. Data were thematically analyzed, revealing significant challenges in content mastery, lesson preparation, and adapting to subject- specific terminologies, often resulting in stress and self-doubt. To address these challenges, teachers employed strategies such as simplifying complex topics, integrating digital tools, collaborating with peers specializing in the assigned subjects, and adopting student-centered techniques. While these strategies maintained classroom engagement and learning continuity, some participants reported overreliance on English-based approaches, which occasionally limited depth and specificity in teaching non-English content. Despite these limitations, the experience fostered professional growth among participants. Teachers reported enhanced resilience, empathy for learners, self-awareness, and a more substantial commitment to reflective practices, contributing to their lifelong learning and improved student relationships. The study concluded that while out-of-field teaching assignments posed difficulties in instructional alignment, they also catalyzed adaptability and personal growth. Recommendations include providing targeted professional development programs, peer mentoring opportunities, and policy reforms to align teacher qualifications with subject assignments. The study also advocates for institutional support systems, such as accessible resources and training programs, to equip teachers for mismatched roles while ensuring quality education. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing the professional challenges of English teachers handling other subjects to enhance their instructional effectiveness and sustain educational outcomes in diverse teaching contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Archer, L. (1999). The problem of ‘mismatch’ in the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(5), 551–566.

Chi, C. (2024, August 30). 62% of high school teachers teaching outside their field, new report reveals. Philstar.com. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/yc38sy4z Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press.

Giorgi, A. (1985). Phenomenology and psychological research. Duquesne University Press.

Hoekstra, A., & Korthagen, F. (2011). Teacher learning in a context of educational change: Informal learning versus systematically supported learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110382917

Montero, J. P., Alagon, E. E., & San Juan, L. (2022). Teaching non-English subjects: Challenges and strategies among English major teachers. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 34(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v5i5p103

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658

Paprock, K. E. (1992). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(3), 195–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369204200309 Pillay, H., Goddard, R., & Wilss, L. (2005). Well-being, burnout, and competence: Implications for teachers. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 30(2).

https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2005v30n2.3

Roxas, K. (2022). Facing the challenges of teaching outside one's field: Strategies for English teachers. International Journal of Language Studies, 16(3), 145–158. Sambe, B. (2020). The psychological impact of mismatched teaching assignments: Implications for teacher retention. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 699–713. Schön, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner. In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Downloads

Published

2025-02-10

How to Cite

Garcia, M., Asuncion, T., Advincula, J., Fernandez, L., Gueta, D. A., Javier, D. R., & Julaton, , J. (2025). English Teachers Handling Other Subjects: A Phenomenological Study. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(3), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0681