Ensuring Quality Instruction Amidst the Performance of Support and Core Functions of Faculty: Input for Establishing Workload Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.599Keywords:
Instruction, Policy, Quality, Support, WorkloadAbstract
This sequential explanatory research design study aimed to determine the quality of instruction being facilitated by faculty with contract of service employment status. At the same time, they performed their support and core functions. The inputs served as a basis for establishing recommendations for a workload policy. The study involved 180 respondents and five participants affiliated with the state university, specifically in Region III. The researcher-designed questionnaires were used in this study to assess teaching performance, time management and workload balance, institutional support, job satisfaction and performance perception, administrative efficiency, and task management. Participants were asked about the factors that hinder them in delivering quality teaching and administrative performances. The results showed that COS faculty effectively deliver lessons and adapt teaching strategies to meet students’ needs. However, the additional and excessive workloads hinder their ability to provide timely feedback, maintain work-life balance, and innovate course materials. They can manage their tasks efficiently through delegation, but sometimes the teaching responsibilities are compromised due to limited institutional resources. Nevertheless, their contributions remain sustainable and impactful, ensuring they remain committed to delivering quality education and services. The findings revealed that multitasking impacts faculty teaching effectiveness due to limited resources, time constraints, compensation disparities, role conflicts, and administrative burdens. To address these issues, the faculty typically resorts to collaborative peer mentoring, stress management, time management, and mindfulness practices to stay focused. The study recommends regular training programs, provision of adequate resources, flexible scheduling, collaboration, performance-based incentives, and reduction of administrative tasks for faculty engaged in innovation, extension, research, and accreditation.
Downloads
References
Afdal, M. (2025). Implementing digital technology in learning in the digital era: Challenges and opportunities for teachers. ETIC (Education and Social Science Journal), 2(5), 488–496.
Ancho, I., & Bongco, R. (2019). Exploring Filipino teachers’ professional workload. Journal of Research Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 9(2), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol9.no2.2.2019
Banks, J., Cochran-Smith, M., Moll, L., Richert, A., Zeichner, K., LePage, P., Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Teaching diverse learners. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. (pp. 232–274). Jossey-Bass.
Biddle, B. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.12.1.67
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.
Case, K., & Luongo, N. (2025). “Return to remote: Are higher education instructors prepared for the future in a post-COVID world?”, To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development 44(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.3998/tia.6260
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us? Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13–25.
Dougherty, K. J., Jones, S. M., Lahr, H., Natow, R. S., Pheatt, L., & Reddy, V. (2016). Looking inside the black box of performance funding for higher education: Policy instruments, organizational obstacles, and intended and unintended impacts. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(1), 147–173. https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2016.2.1.07
Fyfe, E. R., De Leeuw, J. R., Carvalho, P. F., Goldstone, R. L., Sherman, J., Admiraal, D., Alford, L. K., Bonner, A., Brassil, C. E., Brooks, C. A., Carbonetto, T., Chang, S. H., Cruz, L., Czymoniewicz-Klippel, M., Daniel, F., Driessen, M., Habashy, N., Hanson-Bradley, C. L., Hirt, E. R., & Motz, B. A. (2021). ManyClasses 1: Assessing the generalizable effect of immediate feedback versus delayed feedback across many college classes. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211027575
García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N., Martín-Montaner, J., & Pérez-Amaral, T. (2015). (How) Do research and administrative duties affect university professors’ teaching? Applied Economics, 47(45), 4868–4883.
Hamid, A., Ricopuerto, J., & Sanson, K. (2024). Rationalization of the scope of work: Evaluation of imbalances and opportunities for multi-tasking. Journal of Education and Academic Settings, 1(1), 1–12.
Jomuad, P. D., Antiquina, L. M. M., Cericos, E. U., Bacus, J. A., Vallejo, J. H., Dionio, B. B., Bazar, J. S., Cocolan, J. V., & Clarin, A. S. (2021). Teachers’ workload in relation to burnout and work performance. International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review. https://tinyurl.com/yc8ma4
Karadağ, N. (2018). Views of instructors about academic productivity. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.154.1
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). Organisation als system. In Handlungssysteme (pp. 217–231). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85709-5_15
Kryshtanovych, M., Akimova, L., Akimov, O., Parkhomenko-Kutsevil, O., & Omarov, A. (2022). Features of creative burnout among educational workers in the public administration system. Creativity Studies, 15(1), 116–121.
Lee, C., Huang, G., & Ashford, S. J. (2017). Job insecurity and the changing workplace: Recent developments and the future trends in job insecurity research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104651
Lüleci, C., & Çoruk, A. (2018). The relationship between morale and job satisfaction of teachers in elementary and secondary schools. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2018.137.3
Nuss, S. V., & Kogan, V. V. (2022). Student-centered approaches to Russian language teaching: Reflections on practice, additional considerations, and the importance of institutional support for teachers (1st ed.) [PDF]. Taylor & Francis.
Pacaol, N. (2021). Teacher’s workload intensification: A qualitative case study of its implications on teaching quality. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 8(1), 43–60.
Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Sengsoulintha, K. (2025, August). Teacher educators' challenges: Focusing on teacher training colleges in Laos. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, p. 1614060). Frontiers.
Shoss, M. K. (2017). Job insecurity: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1911–1939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317691574
Stuckey, H. L. (2015). The second step in data analysis: Coding qualitative research data. Journal of Social Health and Diabetes, 3(1), 7–10.
Tareke, T. G., Woreta, G. T., Zewude, G. T., Amukune, S., Oo, T. Z., & Józsa, K. (2024). Overview of Ethiopian public higher education: Trends, system, challenges, and quality issues. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1065.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.