Assessment of the “No Fire Bonus Plan” as a Forest Fire Prevention Strategy in the Province of Mountain Province: An Explanatory Sequential Inquiry

Beberly Calugan; Lillian Pagulongan

doi:10.69569/jip.2025.692

Authors

Beberly T. Calugan Baguio Central University, Baguio City, Benguet, Philippines/Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Baguio City, Benguet, Philippines
Lillian S. Pagulongan Baguio Central University, Baguio City, Benguet, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.692

Keywords:

Program assessment, “No Fire Bonus Plan”, Forest fire prevention, Mountain Province, Mixed methods

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of the “No Fire Bonus Plan” as a forest fire prevention strategy in the province of Mountain Province, employing an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. The research assessed community awareness of forest fire risks, the Plan’s operational mechanics, its implementing guidelines, and the perceived seriousness of implementation challenges. The quantitative phase (surveys) revealed a Very Much Aware (VMA) level regarding forest fire risks (Weighted Mean [WM] = 4.79) and prevention responsibilities, but only a Moderate Awareness (MoA) of the "No Fire Bonus Plan" mechanics (WM = 3.04), indicating a significant gap in operational knowledge. Furthermore, there was Strong Agreement (SA) with the Plan's implementation guidelines (WM = 4.79), confirming community support for transparent, participatory rules. Conversely, the challenges encountered were deemed Very Highly Serious (VHS) (WM = 4.65), driven by concerns over insufficient funding, inadequate training, and a lack of long-term sustainable strategies. The qualitative phase (interviews) explained these findings, revealing two key emergent themes: (1) The Willing but Unskilled Partner (high responsibility but low practical safety knowledge, which complements the high risk awareness but low WM on safety practices) and (2) Institutionalizing the Incentive (a strong desire for the Plan's legal formalization to prevent political interference, which reinforces the VHS rating for funding and sustainability). The results conclude that while the community strongly supports the Plan and understands the risks, the effectiveness of the incentive is severely undermined by organizational gaps and a critical lack of resources, highlighting the need for robust, context-sensitive, and well-funded operational frameworks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, A., Adriani, S., & Priyanto, E. (2021, April). The potential for peatland villages to prevent fire: Case study of Tumbang Nusa Village Central Kalimantan. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 758, No. 1, p. 012017). IOP Publishing.

Barber, N.R., Alvarado, E., Kane, V., Mell, W., & Moskal, L.M. (2021). Estimating fuel moisture in grasslands using UAV-mounted infrared and visible light sensors. Sensors, 21(19), 6350. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196350

Barmpoutis, P., Papaioannou, P., Dimitropoulos, K., & Grammalidis, N. (2020). A review on early forest fire detection systems using optical remote sensing. Sensors, 20(22), 6442. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226442

Berlinck, C.N., Lima, L.H.A., Pereira, A.M.M., Carvalho, E.A.R., Jr., Paula, R.C., Thomas, W.M., & Morato, R.G. (2021). The Pantanal is on fire and only a sustainable agenda can save the largest wetland in the world. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 82. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.244200

Byerly, H., Meldrum, J., Brenkert-Smith, H., Champ, P., Gomez, J., Falk, L., & Barth, C. (2020). Developing behavioral and evidence-based programs for wildfire risk mitigation. Fire, 3(4), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire3040066

Cagasan, E.G., Gravoso, R.S., Bales, M.C., Bulayog, E.F., Ongy, E.E., & Alao, F.T. (2022). Surfacing development needs of a marginal upland community through participatory tools: The case of village in Samar, Philippines. Annals of Tropical Research, 44(1), 99–113.

Calugan, B.T. (2024). Forest fire suppression in Benguet: A systematic review. Innovations, (79).

Casallas, A., Jiménez-Saenz, C., Torres, V.J., Quirama-Aguilar, M., Lizcano, A., López-Barrera, E.A., Ferro, C., Celis, N., & Arenas, R. (2022). Design of a forest fire early alert system through a deep 3D-CNN structure and a WRF-CNN bias correction. Sensors, 22(22), 8790. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228790

Celis, N., Casallas, A., López-Barrera, E.A., Felician, M., Marchi, M.D., & Pappalardo, S.E. (2023). Climate change, forest fires, and territorial dynamics in the Amazon rainforest: An integrated analysis for mitigation strategies. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(10), 436.

Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cosma, G. (2024). From theory to practice: The importance of fire engineering education in today’s world. Jensen Hughes. https://www.jensenhughes.com/europe/insights

Climate Adaptation Science Centers. (2021). Cycles of renewal: Returning good fire to the Chumash homelands. USGS. https://tinyurl.com/zv3uc3f9

D’Argonne, S. (2020). Anatomy of a wildfire: How fuel sources, weather and topography influence wildfire behavior. Summit Daily. https://tinyurl.com/528wx36r

Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). (2024). Annual report of the enforcement division. DENR-CAR.

Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). (n.d.). Forest fire prevention mitigation response and management: A manual.

Eslit, E. (2023). Empowering change at the grassroots: Community-led initiatives for local environmental protection. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202307.1055.v1

Feng, X., Merow, C., Liu, Z., Park, D.S., Roehrdanz, P.R., Maitner, B., & Enquist, B.J. (2021). How deregulation, drought and increasing fire impact Amazonian biodiversity. Nature, 597(7877), 516–521.

Ferrer, L.J., De Torres, M., & Vargas, D. (2021). Communication strategies and disaster risk reduction management. Available at SSRN 3791093.

Glicksman, R.L., & Wentz, J. (2023). Irreconcilable differences or comfortably compatible?: Adaptive management and environmental assessments. Environmental Law, 53(2), 123–145.

Guillermo, M. (2023). Perceptions on the implementation of the Philippine development plan in ensuring efficient governance. Open Journal of Leadership, 12(4), 375–399.

Hollmann, S., Regierer, B., Bechis, J., Tobin, L., & D’Elia, D. (2022). Ten simple rules on how to develop a stakeholder engagement plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 18(10), e1010520.

Hyland-Wood, B., Gardner, J., Leask, J., & Ecker, U. (2021). Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00701-w

Kager, N., Sparr, J., & Grote, G. (2022). Looking for guidance? Five principles for leveraging tensions in corporate–startup collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 58(4), 682–715.

Kreider, M., Higuera, P., Parks, S., Rice, W., White, N., & Larson, A. (2024). Fire suppression makes wildfires more severe and accentuates impacts of climate change and fuel accumulation. Nature Communications, 15(1), 2412.

Li, W.-C., Tseng, J.-M., & Huang, H.-S. (2022). Effectiveness of advanced fire prevention and emergency response training at nursing homes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13185.

Liagre, L., Pettenella, D., Pra, A., Ortiz, F.C., Arguedas, A.G., & Chien, C.N. (2021). How can national forest funds catalyse the provision of ecosystem services? Lessons learned from Costa Rica, Vietnam, and Morocco. Ecosystem Services, 47, 101228.

Maclean, K., Hankins, D.L., Christianson, A.C., Oliveras, I., Bilbao, B.A., Costello, O., & Robinson, C.J. (2023). Revitalising Indigenous cultural fire practice: Benefits and partnerships. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 38(10), 899–902.

Mahendra, A., King, R., Du, J., Dasgupta, A., Beard, V.A., Kallergis, A., & Schalch, K. (2021). “Seven transformations for more equitable and sustainable cities”. World Resources Report, Towards a More Equal City. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. https://doi.org/10.46830/wrirpt.19.00124

Magazzino, C., Cerulli, G., Shahzad, U., & Khan, S. (2023). The nexus between agricultural land use, urbanization, and greenhouse gas emissions: Novel implications from different stages of income levels. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 14(9), 101846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2023.101846

Mulyasari, F., Harahap, A.K., Rio, A.O., Sule, R., & Kadir, W.G.A. (2021). Potentials of the public engagement strategy for public acceptance and social license to operate: Case study of Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage Gundih Pilot Project in Indonesia. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 108, 103312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103312

National Park Service. (2023). Wildland fire behavior. https://www.nps.gov/articles/wildland-fire-behavior. htm

Nizmi, Y.E., Olivia, Y., Retnaningsih, U.O., Saeri, M., Jama’an, A., & Alfajri, A. (2021). The peatland restoration agency’s economic revitalization program in achieving the transboundary haze-free ASEAN 2020 in Riau Province. BERUMPUN: International Journal of Social, Politics, and Humanities, 4(2), 167–183.

Noviana, E., Kurniaman, O., Guslinda, Munjiatun, Zufriady, Z., & Dewi, R.S. (2020). Identification of knowledge mitigation of forest and land fire disasters; A preliminary study for management of disaster learning in elementary school. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1655(1), 12097. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012097

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.

Pogeyed, M.L. (1998). Philippines: No Fire Bonus Plan program of Mountain Province. International Forest Fire News No. 18, 52-56.

Ranjithkumar, A. (2025). Assessing the impact of agricultural land reduction on future global food security: Challenges and sustainable solutions. Indian Journal of Natural Sciences, 15(88).

Ryan, B., Johnston, K.A., Taylor, M., & McAndrew, R. (2020). Community engagement for disaster preparedness: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 49, 101655.

Sharma, S., & Dhakal, K. (2021). Boots on the ground and eyes in the sky: A perspective on estimating fire danger from soil moisture content. Fire, 4(3), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire4030045

Sharpe, L., Harwell, M., & Jackson, C. (2021). Integrated stakeholder prioritization criteria for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 282, 111719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111719

Stolte, D. (2021). Study shows impacts of deforestation and forest burning on Amazon biodiversity. University of Arizona. https://news.arizona.edu/news/

Synolakis, C.E., & Karagiannis, G.M. (2024). Wildfire risk management in the era of climate change. PNAS Nexus, 3(5), pgae151.

Thapa, S.B., Jenkins, J.S., & Westerling, A.L. (2023). Perceptions of wildfire management practices in a California wildland-urban interface. Environmental Advances, 12, 100382.

Turin, T.C., Kazi, M., Rumana, N., Lasker, M.A., & Chowdhury, N. (2023). Conceptualising community engagement as an infinite game implemented through finite games of ‘research’, ‘community organising’ and ‘knowledge mobilisation’. Health Expectations, 26(5), 1799-1805. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13801

United Nations. (n.d.). Sustainable Development Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals

Williams, N.J., Candon, M., Stewart, R.E., Byeon, Y.V., Bewtra, M., Buttenheim, A.M., Zentgraf, K., Comeau, C., Shoyinka, S., & Beidas, R.S. (2021). Community stakeholder preferences for evidence-based practice implementation strategies in behavioral health: A best-worst scaling choice experiment. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1).

Yuliarti, A., & Ariyani, E. (2023). Information media as a public communication in fire mitigation in South Kalimantan. MetaCommunication: Journal of Communication Studies, 8(1), 59–70.