Climate Justice Awareness and Local Climate and Disaster Governance: A Generalized Linear Modelling
Keywords:
Climate justice awareness, Climate, Disaster governance, Environmental Justice Theory, Generalized Linear ModelAbstract
Climate justice and climate justice awareness have gained increasing attention through research, advocacy, and education, reinforced by global commitments such as Sustainable Development Goal 13. However, the Municipality of Obando, Bulacan, lacks published policy briefs, empirical studies, documentation, or baseline data examining climate justice awareness and its linkage to local climate and disaster governance. No formal municipal assessments have been conducted to evaluate these understudied yet critical variables. Addressing this gap, the present study, anchored in Environmental Justice Theory, examined how recognitional, procedural, distributive, and intergenerational justice influence local climate and disaster governance in Obando, Bulacan. The study adopted a quantitative descriptive–correlational research design utilizing descriptive statistics and Generalized Linear Modeling (GLM), comparing Gaussian and Gamma log-link specifications. This was used to compare distributional assumptions for climate justice and governance perception data. Findings revealed that residents exhibited moderate climate justice awareness and a moderate level of agreement with existing climate and disaster governance mechanisms. Results from the Gaussian model indicated that recognitional, procedural, and distributive justice were significant predictors, while intergenerational justice was not. In contrast, the Gamma log-link model showed that all four climate justice dimensions significantly influenced local climate and disaster governance. Moreover, the Gamma model demonstrated strong goodness-of-fit, confirming the theoretical and empirical alignment of Environmental Justice Theory with the local context and its suitability in capturing the non-normal and socially differentiated nature of justice perceptions. The study recommends institutionalizing justice-centered climate and disaster governance, with emphasis on equitable resource distribution, inclusive participation, and intergenerational planning.
Downloads
References
Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J.J., Garcia-Lamarca, M., Cole, H., & Pearsall, H. (2019). New scholarly pathways on green gentrification: What does the urban ‘green turn’mean and where is it going? Progress in Human Geography, 43(6), 1064-1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325188037
Boateng, G., Neilands, T., Frongillo, E., Melgar-Quiñonez, H., & Young, S. (2020). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Carman, J., Ballew, M., Lu, D., Leiserowitz, A., et al. (2023). Climate change in the American mind: Climate justice, spring 2023. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
Chu, E., Anguelovski, I., & Roberts, D. (2017). Climate adaptation as strategic urbanism: Assessing opportunities and uncertainties for equity and inclusive development in cities. Cities, 60, 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.016
Cochran, W. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://tinyurl.com/7b6uc3k8
Creswell, J. (2014). Controversies in mixed methods research. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4, 269–284. https://url-shortener.me/DE35
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://tinyurl.com/3zj9ww8m
Eriksen, S., Schipper, E.L., Scoville-Simonds, M., Vincent, K., Adam, H.N., Brooks, N., West, J.J., et al. (2021). Adaptation interventions and their effect on vulnerability in developing countries: Help, hindrance or irrelevance? World Development, 141, 105383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105383
Ferreira, T.M. (2023). Current advances on the assessment and mitigation of fire risk in buildings and urban areas—First Edition. Fire, 6(12), 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6120454
Greenpeace Philippines. (2024). A climate justice agenda for the Philippines: How the Marcos administration can turn words into action. https://act.gp/cjagendph
Kashwan, P., Biermann, F., Gupta, A., & Okereke, C. (2020). Planetary justice: Prioritizing the poor in Earth system governance. Earth System Governance, 6, 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100075
Lagos, D., Eco, N., Rebadolla, L.J. & Farin, F.A.B. (2024). Flooding and subsidence research Bulacan Province, Northern Manila Bay Area, Philippines. ResearchGate. https://tinyurl.com/yc3zzs73
Meerow, S., & Woodruff, S. (2020). Seven principles of strong climate change planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 86(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1652108
Newell, P., Srivastava, S., Naess, L.O., Torres Contreras, G., & Price, R. (2020). Towards transformative climate justice: Key challenges and future directions for research. The Institute of Development Studies and Partner Organisations. Report. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12413/15497
Ogunbode, C., Doran, R., Ayanian, A., et al. (2024). Climate justice beliefs related to climate action and policy support around the world. Nature Climate Change, 14, 1144–1150. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02168-y
Otto, I., Donges, J., Cremades, R., Bhowmik, A., Hewitt, R., Lucht, W., Schellnhuber, H.J., et al. (2020). Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(5), 2354–2365. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900577117
Prieto, N.G., Naval, V.V., & Carey, T.G. (2017). Practical research 2 for Senior High School: Quantitative. K to 12 Based.
Provincial Development and Physical Framework Plan (PDPFP). (2024). DRR-CCA enhanced: Provincial development and physical framework plan 2010-2020. Province of Bulacan. https://tinyurl.com/bdf59utx
Sanz, M.J., & Blazquez, A.K.P. (2025). Analysis of international climate change governance for the agriculture, forest and land use sector: Gaps and recommendations for future improvement. Earth System Governance, 25, 100278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2025.100278
Schlosberg, D. (2020). Environmental justice: Key issues and future directions. Environmental Politics, 29(2), 1–10.
Schlosberg, D., & Collins, L. (2014). From environmental to climate justice: Climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.275
Sovacool, B., Martiskainen, M., Hook, A., & Baker, L. (2019). Decarbonization, democracy, and climate justice: Conceptual frameworks for a just transition. Energy Policy, 172, 113287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02521-7
Taber, K. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Ziervogel, G., Lennard, C., Midgley, G., New, M., Simpson, N., Trisos, C., & Zvobgo, L. (2022). Climate change in South Africa: Risks and opportunities for climate-resilient development in the IPCC Sixth Assessment WGII Report. South African Journal of Science, 118(9-10), 11–15. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/sajsci/article/view/233486
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.