Exploring Governance Satisfaction Among Rural Barangay Leaders in the City of Calamba, Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0696Keywords:
Accountability, Barangay, Governance, SatisfactionAbstract
This study investigated the quality of governance among rural barangay chairmen and its impact on constituents’ satisfaction in the City of Calamba. It aimed to evaluate how well principles of good governance—such as accountability, transparency, responsiveness, fairness, legitimacy, effectiveness, and participation—are practiced. This study aimed to address these gaps by examining the qualities of leadership and governance practices at the barangay level. By identifying the strengths and weaknesses of barangay leadership in promoting good governance, this study contributed to the broader discussion on local governance and its significance in national development. A causal research design was employed, using a self-administered questionnaire to gather data from 17 barangay chairmen and 340 constituents, totaling 357 respondents. Findings indicated that good governance was rated as "Extremely Manifested" across all measured dimensions, with high satisfaction levels among constituents regarding policy implementation, fund disbursement, and barangay operations. However, even though the findings indicate that transparency and responsiveness are manifested, these principles do not significantly influence constituents' satisfaction with good governance in rural barangays of Calamba City. On the other hand, a significant positive relationship was found between the level of good governance practices and constituents’ satisfaction. Governance in rural barangays of Calamba City shows a strong commitment to budget accountability, with a need to strengthen adherence to treasury regulations for comprehensive governance excellence. These findings highlight the effectiveness of current governance practices and suggest areas for continued focus to overcome governance challenges and promote sustainable development. The results revealed that there was a significant relationship between the levels of manifestation and constituents’ satisfaction.
Downloads
References
Abalos, J. M. (2019). The Quality of Services Delivered by the Barangays in Bansud and the Constituents’ Level of Satisfaction: A Basis for a Proposed Service Delivery Improvement Plan.
Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Conference Proceedings, 3(3). https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/aajmrcp/article/view/702 Adegbola, O., & Gearhart, S. (2019). Examining the relationship between media use and political engagement: A comparative study among the United States, Kenya, and Nigeria.
International Journal of Communication, 13, 21. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/10501 Atienza, K. (2023). Philippines falls in global good governance index. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/559dd3rw
Aurangzeb, D. M. A. (2022). Conceptual & Theoretical Framework of Governance And Nexus Between Bureaucracy And Governance. Pakistan Journal of International Affairs, 5(2), 1674- 1684. https://doi.org/10.52337/pjia.v5i2.571
Castillo, L. C., & Gabriel, A. G. (2020). Transparency and accountability in the philippine local government. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 1–9). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3895-1
Chattopadhyay, S. (2015). Contesting inclusiveness: Policies, politics and processes of participatory urban governance in Indian cities. Progress in Development Studies, 15(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993414546969
Chien, N. B., & Thanh, N. N. (2022). The Impact of Good Governance on the People’s Satisfaction with Public Administrative Services in Vietnam. Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010035
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Da Cruz, N. F., Rode, P., & McQuarrie, M. (2019). New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1499416
Devas, N., & Grant, U. (2003). Local government decision‐making—citizen participation and local accountability: Some evidence from Kenya and Uganda. Public Administration and Development, 23(4), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.281
Häikiö, L. (2007). Expertise, representation and the common good: Grounds for legitimacy in the urban governance network. Urban Studies, 44(11), 2147–2162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701518982
Howlett, M. (2019). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. Routledge.
Krawczyk, K. A., & Sweet-Cushman, J. (2017). Understanding political participation in West Africa: the relationship between good governance and local citizen engagement. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(1_suppl), 136-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315619024
Mcmenamin, E. (2021). Serving As a Representative of the People: A Guide to Engaging Your Constituents. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/mr2awudj Menguin, J. (2023). Punong Barangay: The Role and Impact of the Community Leader. Retrieved from https://jefmenguin.com/punong-barangay/
Noor, S., Tajik, O., & Golzar, J. (2022). Simple random sampling. International Journal of Education and Language Studies, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.22034/ijels.2022.162982 Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. (2023). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge.
Savur, S., Baker, F., & Durrant, T. (2024). The benefits of transparency. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/mvc66md6
Scanlon, T. M. (2019). 'Political Fairness', Why Does Inequality Matter? Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198812692.003.0006
Seetharam Sridhar, K., Gadgil, R., & Dhingra, C. (2020). Paving the way for better governance in urban transport: The transport governance initiative. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9620-5
Sterner, T., & Coria, J. (2013). Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. Routledge.
Widanti, N. P. T. (2022). Good governance for efficient public services responsive and transparent. International Journal of Demos, 4(2). http://hk-publishing.id/ijd-demos/index
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
