A Pragmatic Discourse Analysis on Illocutionary Speech Acts in TikTok Videos for Language Learning Among Filipino Educational Content Creators

Authors

  • Quennie Marie C. Battad University of Immaculate Conception, Davao City, Philippines
  • Edwell Vincent D. Rojas University of Immaculate Conception, Davao City, Philippines
  • Julie Ann S. Talandron University of Immaculate Conception, Davao City, Philippines
  • Khissey Mae C. Wisco University of Immaculate Conception, Davao City, Philippines
  • Ivan T. Barroga University of Immaculate Conception, Davao City, Philippines
  • Danilo Baradillo University of Immaculate Conception, Davao City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.136

Keywords:

Digital language learning, Illocutionary speech acts, Multimodal communication, TikTok education, Technology-mediated learning

Abstract

The increasing use of social media platforms in education has created new opportunities for language learning through short-form digital content. However, limited studies have examined how pragmatic features, such as illocutionary speech acts, function within these instructional environments. This study investigates how Filipino Educational content creators on TikTok employ illocutionary speech acts to support language learning. Specifically, it identifies the types of illocutionary speech acts used in TikTok-based language-learning videos, examines how these acts are realized through verbal and non-verbal features, and analyzes how they facilitate comprehension and interaction among learners. The study utilized qualitative discourse analysis of selected TikTok videos produced by Filipino language educators. The analysis was anchored in John Searle’s (1976) classification of illocutionary speech acts, Dell Hymes’ (1974) SPEAKING framework for verbal features, and Mark L. Knapp and Judith Hall’s (2014) framework for non-verbal communication. The findings reveal that four types of illocutionary speech acts - assertive, directive, commissive, and expressive – are commonly used in TikTok educational content. Assertive acts primarily explain grammatical rules and clarify language use, while directive acts encourage learner participation through prompts and instructions. Commissive acts signal the speaker’s commitment to providing explanations and examples, whereas expressive acts help establish rapport and maintain a positive learning environment. The integration of verbal explanations and non-verbal cues, such as gestures, eye contact, and vocal modulation, enhances instructional clarity and promotes audience engagement. Overall, the study highlights the role of speech acts and multimodal communication in facilitating comprehension and interaction in digital language-learning contexts and demonstrates the potential of TikTok as an effective platform for microlearning and technology-mediated language instruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abad, A., & Sapan, J. (2024). Code-switching practices of Filipino English teaching content creators on TikTok. Journal of Language and Digital Education, 4(1), 22–36.

Abantas, C. (2025). TikTok-based instructional content and learners’ oral communication skills. Mindanao Journal of Language Studies, 3(1), 45–60.

Abduh, A., & Bakistuta, B. (2023). The influence of TikTok on elementary students’ speech behavior. Journal of Language and Education, 9(2), 112–126.

Adistri, A., Rahman, F., & Sari, D. (2024). TikTok as an information, education, and entertainment platform for young users. Journal of Digital Media Studies, 6(1), 1–15.

Adistri, N., Rusman, A. A., & Irwansyah. (2024). Pemenuhan kebutuhan informasi pada TikTok: Studi uses and gratification di era digital. Jurnal Lensa Mutiara Komunikasi, 8(2), 103–116.

Anumanthan, M., & Hashim, H. (2022). TikTok as a supplementary tool to enhance ESL learners’ vocabulary and comprehension. Information and Learning Sciences, 123(5/6), 301–317.

Anumanthan, S., & Hashim, H. (2022). Improving the learning of regular verbs through TikTok among primary school ESL pupils. Creative Education, 13, 897–912. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.133059

Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Bakistuta, E.T., & Abduh, M. (2023). Dampak media sosial TikTok terhadap tindak tutur siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 6(3), 1201–1217. https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v6i3.6243

Bernard, A.V. (2021). Expanding ESL students’ vocabulary through TikTok videos. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, Dan Budaya, 11(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.11.2.2021.171-184

Bernard, J. (2021). TikTok-based learning and student engagement in ESL contexts. International Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 55–69.

British Psychological Society. (2021). Ethics guidelines for internet-mediated research. https://www.bps.org.uk

Clemente, A. (2024). The conversational functions and effects of Tagalog-English code-switching on Filipino television. University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.32396/usurj.v9i2.763

Clemente, R. (2024). Tagalog–English code-switching as a communicative strategy in Philippine digital discourse. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 55(1), 78–94.

Conde-Caballero, C., Castillo-Sarmiento, M., & Ballesteros-Yánez, I. (2024). Microlearning through TikTok: Acceptance and engagement in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(4), 911–926.

De Matta, N., Cruz, J., & Villanueva, P. (2025). TikTok English teaching videos and elementary learners’ language development. Asia-Pacific Journal of Language Education, 10(1), 23–39.

De Matta, S.M., Ibaite, X., Revistual, N.A., & Fajardo, D.F. (2023). Effects of TikTok English teaching videos in the second language acquisition of elementary learners. Dialektika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Budaya, 10(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.33541/dia.v10i2.5391

Factor, L. (2022). Influencers as informal educators in digital learning spaces. Journal of Media Literacy, 14(2), 44–58.

Factor, R. (2022). Code switching of Filipino elementary teachers in online platforms. International Journal of Research Publications, 101(1), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1001011520223184

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R.E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1291–1322.

Gao, F., Wang, C., Xie, H., & Hong, J. (2024). Social interaction and online learning efficiency: The mediating role of social presence and learning engagement. Behavioral Sciences, 14(10), 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100896

Harun, M.J., & Bandar, J. (2025). Language learning through social media platforms among Gen Z: Analysis of acceptance, change, and effectiveness. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(10).

Jamisolamin, R., Dela Cruz, A., & Flores, M. (2025). TikTok engagement and English vocabulary development among college students in Northern Mindanao. Journal of Philippine Education Research, 7(1), 66–82.

Li, P. (2022). Digital language learning: Insights from behavior, cognition, and the brain. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(3), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000353

Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0016

Mariano, F.I.M., & Agbayani, R.S. (2024). TikTok lexical contents in use: Attitudes among Bachelor of Arts in English Language (ABEL) students. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 5(3), 983–993. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v5i3.1038

Mariano, P., & Agbayani, E. (2024). Vocabulary-focused TikTok videos and English vocabulary development of Filipino English majors. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 101–117.

Metwally, A.A. (2025). Digital technology in EFL education: Students’ emotional and cognitive reflections. International Journal of Information and Education Technology.

Nguyen, H., & Tran, T. (2024). Students’ perceptions of using TikTok to improve speaking skills. Vietnam Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 34–49.

Nguyen, T.T.V., & Tran, T.T.M. (2024). Exploring student’s perspectives and practices: Using TikTok in the context of sophomore EFL Speaking 4 learning at Van Lang University. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 4(2), 160–182. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.24429

Perez, A., Santos, R., & Lim, J. (2025). Language strategies of Filipino influencers in educational TikTok content. Journal of Sociolinguistic Studies, 9(1), 89–105.

Perez, A.C.D., & Perez, L.B. (2025). Corpus-based analysis of code-switching in the teaching of tertiary-level English courses. Puissant.

Perez, L.C., Triyono, S., & Putro, N.H.P.S. (2025). Taglish talk: A sociolinguistic analysis of code-switching in Filipino vlogs. International Journal of Environmental Sciences. https://doi.org/10.64252/ehk11m02

Putri, R., & Marlina, L. (2019). An analysis of speech acts used in classroom interaction. Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(3), 451–459. https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt/article/view/103213

Roshdi, M., & Rahmat, N. (2023). TikTok as a digital tool for vocabulary acquisition among ESL learners. Cogent Education, 10(1), Article 2180937.

Roshdi, N.I.A., & Rahmat, N.H. (2023). How does TikTok influence the acquisition of form and meaning in language use? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(4), 1159–1173. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i4/16803

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213

Slota, R. (2026). Digital platforms and the transformation of language learning practices. Journal of Technology-Mediated Learning, 11(1), 1–14.

Suarez, A.P.A., Revamonte, C.J.L., Balimbingan, M.H., Irong, I.A.C., & Suco, E.J. (2023). Discourse analysis on vague language used in advertisement videos by TikTok influencers. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 5(2), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i2.1260

Suarez, L., Mendoza, K., & Rivera, T. (2023). Vague language use in Filipino TikTok advertisements. Philippine Journal of Communication Research, 15(2), 120–136.

Tan, E., Ng, K., & Saw, K. (2022). TikTok and education: A scoping review of pedagogical features. Educational Research Review, 36, Article 100419.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Zappa, A. (2025). Social interaction and second language learning: A review of theoretical and empirical perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Battad, Q. M., Rojas, E. V., Talandron, J. A., Wisco, K. M., Barroga, I., & Baradillo, D. (2026). A Pragmatic Discourse Analysis on Illocutionary Speech Acts in TikTok Videos for Language Learning Among Filipino Educational Content Creators. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 4(5), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.136

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.