Electoral Inducements and Voter Decision-Making: Patterns and Influences in a Philippine City

Authors

  • Jefferson M. Delmendo Department of Political Science, Urdaneta City University, Urdaneta City, Philippines/Department of Political Science, University of the Cordilleras, Baguio City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.173

Keywords:

Clientelism, Electoral inducements, Philippine elections, Vote buying, Voting behavior

Abstract

Vote buying remains a persistent challenge in Philippine elections, raising concerns about democratic integrity despite existing legal safeguards. This study examined how and why vote buying continues and its influence on voter decision-making in a local context. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, the research combined quantitative and qualitative data from 395 registered voters across ten urban and rural barangays in Urdaneta City, Pangasinan, Philippines. Data were gathered through survey questionnaires and follow-up interviews, and analyzed using descriptive statistics and appropriate tests of differences and associations. Results show that transactional inducements, such as cash and goods, are widely observed and normalized in local elections, but have limited influence on actual voting decisions. In contrast, programmatic inducements—such as promises of employment, education, and social services—are perceived as more influential, indicating a preference for long-term benefits. Most socio demographic variables showed no significant relationship with participation in vote buying, except for religious affiliation. Qualitative findings suggest that economic conditions shape voters’ openness to electoral incentives, though these do not necessarily determine voting behavior. The study concludes that vote buying persists as a normalized, yet complex practice shaped by socio-economic and political factors. It highlights the coexistence of transactional and programmatic motivations in electoral behavior and underscores the need for stronger governance, voter education, and structural reforms to enhance electoral integrity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abocejo, F. (2014). The veracity of vote buying: Perspective of the Philippine electoral system. International Journal on Graft and Corruption, 2(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.7719/ijgc.v2i1.301

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvdtphhq

Banegas, R. (2002). La démocratie à pas de caméléon. Editions Karthala.

Brusco, V., Nazareno, M., & Stokes, S. (2004). Vote buying in Argentina. Latin American Research Review, 39(2), 66–88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1555401

Callahan, W. (2005). The discourse of vote buying and political reform in Thailand. Pacific Affairs, 78(1), 95–113. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40023443

Calvo, E., & Murillo, M.V. (2004). Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 742–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00099.x

Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E., & Stokes, D.E. (1960). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.

Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Cruz, C. (2019). Social networks and the targeting of vote buying. Comparative Political Studies, 52(3), 382–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018784062

Cruz, C., Keefer, P., Labonne, J., & Trebbi, F. (2024). Making policies matter: Voter responses to campaign promises. The Economic Journal, 134(661), 1875–1913. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueae008

De Leon, H.S. (2004). Textbook on the Philippine Constitution. Rex Printing Press.

Evans, J. (2004). Voters and voting: An introduction. Sage Publications.

Finan, F., & Schechter, L. (2012). Vote-buying and reciprocity. Econometrica, 80(2), 863–881. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9035

Gersbach, H., & Mühe, F. (2011). Vote-buying and growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 15(5), 656–680. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100510000246

Guardado, J. R., & Wantchekon, L. (2014). Do electoral handouts affect voting behavior? Electoral Studies, 53, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.11.002

Hicken, A., Leider, S., Ravanilla, N., & Yang, D. (2014). Temptation in vote selling: Evidence from a field experiment in the Philippines. CESifo Working Paper No. 4828. https://tinyurl.com/3pkw5nuw

Keefer, P., & Vlaicu, R. (2008). Democracy, credibility, and clientelism. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 24(2), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewm054

Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S.I. (2007). Patrons, clients, and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition. Cambridge University Press.

Kramon, E. (2010). Why do politicians distribute gifts during campaigns? (Unpublished manuscript).

Kramon, E. (2012). Vote buying or costly signaling? Cash handouts and political credibility in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation manuscript).

Lindberg, S., Lo Bue, M., & Sen, K. (2022). Clientelism, corruption and the rule of law. World Development, 158, 105989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105989

Nichter, S. (2008). Vote buying or turnout buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080106

Pacis, V. (1971). Philippine government and politics (3rd ed.). Phoenix Publishing.

Ravanilla, N., Davidson, M., & Hicken, A. (2022). Voting in clientelistic social networks: Evidence from the Philippines. Comparative Political Studies, 55(10), 1715–1747. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211060275

Ravanilla, N., Haim, D., & Hicken, A. (2022). Brokers, social networks, reciprocity, and clientelism. American Journal of Political Science, 66(3), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12604

Schaffer, F.C. (2002). Might cleaning up elections keep people away from the polls? International Political Science Review, 23(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512102023001004

Schaffer, F.C. (2005). What is vote buying? Massachusetts Institute of Technology Working Paper.

Shaw, J. (2002). Public choice theory. In: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. Liberty Fund.

Stokes, S. (2005). Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051683

Vicente, P. (2012). Is vote buying effective? Evidence from a field experiment in West Africa. The Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12086

Vilalta, C. (2010). Vote-buying crime reports in Mexico: Magnitude and correlates. Crime, Law and Social Change, 54, 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-010-9260-7

Wu, C., & Huang, C. (2004). Politics and judiciary verdicts on vote-buying litigation in Taiwan. Asian Survey, 44(5), 755–770. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2004.44.5.755

Zaide, D. (1997). Political science. All-Nations Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-15

How to Cite

Delmendo, J. (2026). Electoral Inducements and Voter Decision-Making: Patterns and Influences in a Philippine City. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 4(6), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.173