Teachers’ Implementation of Vocabulary-Building Strategies: Its Influence on Learners’ Reading Comprehension
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.210Keywords:
Candijay District, Bohol, Elementary learners, Reading comprehension, Vocabulary-building strategies, Vocabulary instructionAbstract
Reading comprehension is a fundamental skill essential for learners’ academic success; however, many elementary pupils experience difficulties due to limited vocabulary knowledge, indicating a gap between vocabulary instruction practices and learners’ comprehension outcomes. This study examined the relationship between teachers’ implementation of vocabulary-building strategies and learners’ reading comprehension in selected public elementary schools in Candijay District, Bohol. A descriptive correlational research design was employed, involving 298 respondents, comprising 13 teachers and 285 Grade 4–6 learners. Data were gathered using a 40-item questionnaire adapted from Mehmood et al. (2025) and the Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI). Weighted Mean and Spearman’s rho were used for data analysis. Results revealed that teachers consistently implemented vocabulary-building strategies, with an overall composite mean of 3.64, interpreted as “Always/Highly Practiced,” while metacognitive strategies had the highest mean (WM = 3.71). Findings also revealed that 75.08% of learners were at the independent reading comprehension level. Furthermore, a strong positive significant relationship was identified between vocabulary-building strategies and reading comprehension (ρ = 0.602, p < 0.001), leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis. These findings suggest that the effective and consistent implementation of vocabulary-building strategies is significantly associated with improved learners’ reading comprehension. Hence, it is recommended that teachers intensify structured and interactive vocabulary instruction to further enhance literacy outcomes among elementary learners.
Downloads
References
Aljasir, N. (2025). Vocabulary learning strategies among Saudi EFL learners: A proficiency-level comparison using think-aloud protocols. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2472480. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2472480
Allagui, B., & Al Naqbi, S. (2024). The contribution of vocabulary knowledge to summary writing quality: Vocabulary size and lexical richness. TESL-EJ, 28(1), 1–27. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1434084
Anderson, B. (2024). Vocabulary talk moves: Using language to promote word learning. Read Teach, 77: 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2263
Ayana, H., Mereba, T., & Alemu, A. (2024). Effect of vocabulary learning strategies on students’ vocabulary knowledge achievement and motivation: The case of grade 11 high school students. Front. Educ. 9:1399350. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1399350
Barnes, Z., & Cartwright, K. (2024). Strategies to build the vocabulary and background knowledge of students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 60(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512241255330
Black, C.K., & Wright, K.L. (2024). What’s up with words? A systematic review of designs, strategies, and theories underlying vocabulary research. Reading Psychology, 45(1), 78–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2253249
Brooks, R., Warmington, M., & Thomson, J. (2024). Evaluating the impact of vocabulary instruction on oral vocabulary, phonemic awareness and nonword reading. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10564-1
Caballero, A., & Dioso, E. (2024). Improving reading comprehension, vocabulary and fluency through the use of Bottom-Up Model: An experiment. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(8), 983–991. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13126616
Cao, Y., & Kim, Y.-S.G. (2025). Longitudinal relations between literacy instruction and early reading achievement: Findings from classroom observations in Grades 1–3. Read Writ 38, 1177–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10556-1
Cervetti, G., Fitzgerald, M., Hiebert, E., & Hebert, M. (2023). Meta-analysis examining the impact of vocabulary instruction on vocabulary knowledge and skill. Reading Psychology, 44(6), 672–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2179146
Chen, X. (2023). Instructional strategies for improving English language learners’ reading comprehension: A systematic review. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,15,125-132. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/15/20231044
Cruz, L.L. (2025). Vocabulary skills in reading English of Grade 5 pupils in new normal within the Schools Division of Zambales: Basis for innovative strategies on vocabulary development. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(11), 5469–5477. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.11.08
Duke, N., Ward, A., & Pearson, P.D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993
Ethel, J., Sienes, L., Madrazo, C., Madrazo, A., & Flores, M. (2025). Learners' innovative vocabulary enhancement strategy, reading proficiency, and academic performance: A correlational study. 14, 216–228. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17610230
Gamboa, M.M., & Quicho, R. (2025). Instructional practices, professional qualities, and teaching strategies in enhancing reading comprehension: A correlational analysis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(6). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.6.8
Giguere, D., Tulloch, M., Core, C., & Hoff, E. (2024). Early skills that predict English reading ability: A longitudinal study of bilingual children from 5 to 10 years. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 246, 105993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105993
Herrera, E. (2022). Improving reading comprehension and vocabulary through explicit vocabulary instructions. Research, Society and Development, 11(15). https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i15.37206
Lawrence, J., Knoph, R., McIlraith, A., Kulesz, P., & Francis, D. (2022). Reading comprehension and academic vocabulary: Exploring relations of item features and reading proficiency. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(2), 669–690. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.434
Li, J.-T., Tong, F., Irby, B., Lara-Alecio, R., & Rivera, H. (2024). The effects of four instructional strategies on English learners’ English reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821994133
Lusaran, C.J., Lusica, T., Mantica, R., Olasiman, K., Pelenio, M.J., Pintac, J., … Ampo, W.M. (2026). Status of learners in numeracy and reading literacy: Examining their performance and challenges with words and numbers. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 4(2), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.774
Mehmood, A., Mehmood, S., & Haq, Z. (2025). Vocabulary learning strategies and their effect on reading comprehension among EFL students. Social Sciences Spectrum, 4(1), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.71085/sss.04.01.437
Mosher, D.M., Burkhauser, M.A., & Kim, J.S. (2024). Improving second-grade reading comprehension through a sustained content literacy intervention: A mixed-methods study examining the mediating role of domain-specific vocabulary. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(4), 550–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000868
Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2021). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
Rahmani, A., Asadi, V., & Xodabande, I. (2022). Using mobile devices for vocabulary learning outside the classroom: Improving the English as foreign language learners’ knowledge of high-frequency words. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899885
Rasekh, Z.E., & Ranjbari, R. (2023). Metacognitive strategy training for vocabulary learning. TESL-EJ, 7(2). https://tinyurl.com/2bu6673j
Raudszus, H., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2021). Patterns and predictors of reading comprehension growth in first and second language readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 44: 400–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12347
Ria, N., & Perdawati, N. (2021). The correlation between vocabulary mastery and reading comprehension of the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Indralaya. Didascein: Journal of English Education, 2(2), 109–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.52333%2Fd.v2i2.825
Soria, S.F. (2024). Reading program in the national learning camp: Teachers’ assessment of its implementation and teaching strategies. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 11(3), Article 030. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2024.1103030
Sukserm, P. (2024). Choosing the right routes: Vocabulary learning strategies for diverse EFL learners. Social Sciences Research and Academic Journal, 19(3), 15–26. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSSRA/article/view/273056
Tarigan, F.N., & Hasibuan, S.A. (2024). Diverse strategies in teaching reading comprehension. Wacana: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran, 22(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.33369/jwacana.v22i1.32910
Taye, T., & Lodebo, T. (2026). The relationship between vocabulary learning strategies, reading comprehension, and motivation among secondary school EFL learners. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102516
Tomatala, S.V., Tobing, J.H., & Katemba, C.V. (2023). Extensive reading strategy and reading comprehension: Individual vs group instruction. Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature and Culture, 9(1). https://tinyurl.com/3hdtsb6m
Villanueva, J. (2022). Language profile, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading comprehension performance among college students. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2061683
Zeng, Y., Kuo, L.-J., Chen, L., Lin, J.-A., & Shen, H. (2025). Vocabulary instruction for English learners: A systematic review connecting theories, research, and practices. Education Sciences, 15(3), 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030262
Zou, D., Huang, Y., & Xie, H. (2021). Digital game-based vocabulary learning: Where are we and where are we going? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5–6), 751–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1640745
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
JIP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Under the Open Access Policy, appropriate attribution can be provided by simply citing the original article.
