Institutional Influences on Tenant Farmers’ Decision-Making and Productivity: A Descriptive Qualitative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.400xKeywords:
Agricultural decision-making, Agricultural productivity, Institutional Theory, Land tenure security, Tenant farmersAbstract
Agricultural productivity among tenant farmers remains a continuing concern despite many programs meant to support farming livelihoods. Past studies have often measured productivity through output, income, and efficiency, but less attention has been given to how tenant farmers understand productivity and how institutions affect their farming decisions. This descriptive qualitative study examined the institutional influences on tenant farmers’ decision-making and productivity in Sta. Marina, Tigatto, Buhangin, Davao City, Philippines. Data were gathered through two focus group discussions with 13 tenant farmers who were members and officers of a farmers’ association and beneficiaries of government and non-government programs. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings showed five major themes. First, formal institutions supported farmers through financial aid, farm inputs, training, infrastructure, and agrarian programs. Second, these forms of support were often limited by delays, irregular delivery, and mismatch with farmers’ actual needs. Third, informal institutions, such as traditional farming knowledge and social networks, remained important in farming decisions. Fourth, farmers understood productivity not only as higher income, but also as lower costs, household security, and better well-being. Fifth, limited capital and insecure land tenure continued to restrict productivity. Market demand also influenced crop choice and production decisions. The study concludes that tenant farmers’ productivity is shaped by formal and informal institutions, market conditions, and structural barriers. It shows that productivity, from the farmers’ view, is mainly a livelihood-centered process focused on household stability and reduced risk. The study recommends timely, needs-based, and market-responsive support, with stronger farmer participation and better access to capital, markets, and secure land tenure.
Downloads
References
Abdul, I., Sari, D.W., Haryanto, T., & Win, T. (2022). Analysis of factors affecting the technical inefficiency on Indonesian palm oil plantation. Scientific Reports, 12, 3381. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07113-7
Anang, B.T., Dokyi, E.O., Asante, B.O., & Donkoh, S. (2022). Technical efficiency of resource-poor maize farmers in northern Ghana. Open Agriculture, 7(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0075
Antwi-Agyei, P., & Stringer, L. (2021). Improving the effectiveness of agricultural extension services in supporting farmers to adapt to climate change: Insights from northeastern Ghana. Climate Risk Management, 32, 100304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100304
Asher, S., & Novosad, P. (2021). Rural road infrastructure and agricultural production: Evidence from India. Journal of Development Economics, 152, 102686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102686
Bakker, T., Dugué, P., & de Tourdonnet, S. (2021). Assessing the effects of Farmer Field Schools on farmers’ trajectories of change in practices. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41, Article 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00667-2
Bellemare, M., Lee, Y.N., & Novak, L. (2021). Contract farming as partial insurance. World Development, 140, 105274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105274
Bezner Kerr, R., Naess, L.O., Allen-O’Neil, B., Totin, E., Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H., Risvoll, C., Rivera-Ferre, M., López-i-Gelats, F., & Eriksen, S. (2022). Interplays between changing biophysical and social dynamics under climate change: Implications for limits to sustainable adaptation in food systems. Global Change Biology, 28(11), 3580–3604.
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16124
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Briones, R. (2021). Philippine agriculture: Current state, challenges, and ways forward (Policy Notes No. 2021-12). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/pn2021.12
Brondízio, E., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Bates, P., Carino, J., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Ferrari, M.F., Galvin, K.A., Reyes-García, V., McElwee, P., Molnár, Z., Samakov, A., & Shrestha, U.B. (2021). Locally based, regionally manifested, and globally relevant: Indigenous and local knowledge, values, and practices for nature. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46, 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-012127
Colorafi, K.J., & Evans, B. (2016). Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(4), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715614171
Galang, I.M. (2021). Land tenure, access to credit, and agricultural performance of agrarian reform beneficiaries, farmer-beneficiaries, and other rural workers (Research Paper Series No. 2021-07). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/rps2021.07
Hossain, M., Mendiratta, V., Mabiso, A., & Songsermsawas, T. (2025). Training, credit, and infrastructure for improving market access among small-scale producers in the Philippines. Food Policy, 132, 102853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102853
Ibrahim, H.K., Hendriks, S.L., & Schönfeldt, H.C. (2023). The effect of land tenure across food security outcomes among smallholder farmers using a flexible conditional difference-in-difference approach. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 21(1), 2220900. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2023.2220900
Jain, M., Barrett, C., Solomon, D., & Ghezzi-Kopel, K. (2023). Surveying the evidence on sustainable intensification strategies for smallholder agricultural systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 48, 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-093911
Kapari, M.K., Hlophe-Ginindza, S.H., Nhamo, L., & Mpandeli, S. (2023). Contribution of smallholder farmers to food security and opportunities for resilient farming systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, Article 1149854. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1149854
Kim, H., Sefcik, J., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768
Krueger, R.A., & Casey, M.A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Sage.
Lelisho, A.E., & Lelisho, M.E. (2024). Impact of credit use on crop productivity and gross income of smallholder farmers: A propensity score matching approach. Discover Agriculture, 2, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-024-00058-7
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Lowder, S., Sánchez, M., & Bertini, R. (2021). Which farms feed the world and has farmland become more concentrated? World Development, 142, 105455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105455
North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Radcliffe, C., Raman, A., & Parissi, C. (2021). Entwining Indigenous knowledge and science knowledge for sustainable agricultural extension: Exploring the strengths and challenges. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 27(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1828112
Regassa, M., Degnet, M., & Melesse, M. (2023). Access to credit and heterogeneous effects on agricultural technology adoption: Evidence from large rural surveys in Ethiopia. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(2), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12329
Ruzzante, S., Labarta, R., & Bilton, A. (2021). Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. World Development, 146, 105599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105599
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
Somanje, A.N., Mohan, G., & Saito, O. (2021). Evaluating farmers’ perception toward the effectiveness of agricultural extension services in Ghana and Zambia. Agriculture & Food Security, 10, Article 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00325-6
Truong, D.D. (2022). Farming households’ satisfaction with quality of agricultural extension services: A case study of Quang Binh Province, Vietnam. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 779477. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.779477
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
JIP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Under the Open Access Policy, appropriate attribution can be provided by simply citing the original article.
