Groundwater Recharge Potential Mapping Using Hydrological Modeling and Remote Sensing in the Lake Lanao Catchment, Philippines

Authors

  • Rohadzma N. Najeb Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Mindanao State University – Marawi, Marawi City, Philippines
  • Warda L. Panondi Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Mindanao State University – Marawi, Marawi City, Philippines
  • Sharifa Sittie Zehara M. Jali Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Mindanao State University – Marawi, Marawi City, Philippines
  • Jecco P. Galela Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Mindanao State University – Marawi, Marawi City, Philippines
  • Benhamin A. Waradil Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Mindanao State University – Marawi, Marawi City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.413

Keywords:

Groundwater recharge mapping, Lake Lanao catchment, Remote sensing, Soil and water assessment tool

Abstract

Groundwater is an increasingly important component of water resources in large watershed systems, particularly in regions where surface water is subject to seasonal variability and increasing demand. In the Philippines, major catchments such as the Lake Lanao watershed play a critical role in supporting domestic use, agriculture, and regional water security, yet spatial information on groundwater recharge potential remains limited. This study mapped groundwater recharge potential zones within the Lake Lanao catchment using an integrated approach combining hydrological modeling and remote sensing techniques. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was applied using data on meteorological conditions, slope gradient, soil type, LULC (land use and land cover), drainage density, and lineament density to simulate hydrological processes relevant to recharge estimation. The resulting groundwater recharge potential map was classified into five zones: Poor, Low, Moderate, Good, and Excellent. Results show that 19.34% (158km2) of the catchment area falls under the “Excellent” recharge category, 17.26% (141km2) under “Good,” 40.15% (328km2) under “Moderate,” 14.57% (119km2) under “Low,” and 8.69% (71km2) under “Poor.” Overall, the catchment is dominated by moderate recharge potential zones. Estimated groundwater recharge rates range from 301 mm to 360 mm annually across the catchment. The findings provide spatially explicit information that can support groundwater resource planning, watershed management, and sustainable water allocation strategies in the Lake Lanao catchment.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Atawneh, D.I., Cartwright, N., & Bertone, E. (2021). Climate change and its impact on the projected values of groundwater recharge: A review. Journal of Hydrology, 601, 126602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126602

Alaoui, A. (2023). A simple method to assess key soil hydraulic properties. Water, 15(3), 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030467

Awan, U.K., & Ismaeel, A. (2014). A new technique to map groundwater recharge in irrigated areas using a SWAT model under changing climate. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 1368–1382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.049

Bagarello, V., Caltabellotta, G., & Iovino, M. (2022). Estimation of hydrodynamic properties of a sandy-loam soil by two analysis methods of infiltration data. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 70(2). https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2022-0005

Baker, T., & Miller, S. (2013). Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to assess land use impact on water resources in an East African watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 486, 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.041

Basset, C., Abou Najm, M., Ghezzehei, T., Hao, X., & Daccache, A. (2023). How does soil structure affect water infiltration? A systematic review. Soil and Tillage Research, 226, 105577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2022.105577

Chowdhury, A., Jha, M.K., Chowdary, V.M., & Mal, B.C. (2009). Integrated remote sensing and GIS based approach for assessing groundwater potential in West Medinipur District, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(1), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160802270131

Dangar, S., & Mishra, V. (2023). Excessive pumping limits the benefits of a strengthening summer monsoon for groundwater recovery in India. One Earth, 6(4), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.03.005

de Vries, J.J., Selaolo, E.T., & Beekman, H.E. (2000). Groundwater recharge in the Kalahari, with reference to paleo-hydrologic conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 238(1–2), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00325-5

Deepa, S., Venkateswaran, S., Ayyandurai, R., Kannan, R., & Prabhu, M.V. (2016). Groundwater recharge potential zones mapping in Upper Manimuktha Sub-basin, Vellar River, Tamil Nadu, India using GIS and remote sensing techniques. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(3), Article 137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0192-9

Dekongmen, B.W., Amoah, P.D., Amisigo, B.A., Larbi, I., Asante, K.O., & Obuobie, E. (2022). Groundwater recharge estimation and potential recharge mapping in the Afram Plains of Ghana using SWAT and remote sensing techniques. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 17, 100741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100741

Edet, A.E., Okereke, C.S., Teme, S.C., & Esu, E.O. (1998). Application of remote sensing data to groundwater exploration: A case study of Cross River State, southeastern Nigeria. Hydrogeology Journal, 6(3), 394 –404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100400050162

Garcia-Hansel, C., & Metillo, E. (2016). Efforts towards the management of Lake Lanao and its watershed. IAMURE International Journal of Ecology and Conservation, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.7718/ijec.v18i1.1116

Gee, G.W., Fayer, M.J., Rockhold, M.L., & Campbell, M.D. (1992). Variations in recharge at the Hanford Site. Northwest Science, 66(4), 237–250.

Ghoto, S.M., Abbasi, H., Memon, S.A. et al. (2025). Mapping and assessing impacts of land use land cover and climate conditions on groundwater quality using RS & GIS. Appl Water Sci 15, 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024-02351-8

Izady, A., Davary, K., Alizadeh, A., Ziaei, A.N., Akhavan, S., Alipoor, A., Joodavi, A., & Brusseau, M.L. (2015). Groundwater conceptualization and modeling using distributed SWAT-based recharge for the semi-arid agricultural Neishaboor Plain, Iran. Hydrogeology Journal, 23(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-014-1219-9

Jha, M.K., & Peiffer, S. (2006). Applications of remote sensing and GIS technologies in groundwater hydrology: Past, present and future. Bayreuther Forum Ökologie (Vol. 112). Bayreuth Centre for Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER). ISBN 978-3-00-018890-9.

Jobbágy, J., Krištof, K., Angelovič, M., & Zsembeli, J. (2023). Evaluation of soil infiltration variability in compacted and uncompacted soil using two devices. Water, 15(10), 1918. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15101918

Lacombe, G., Douangsavanh, S., Vongphachanh, S., & Pavelic, P. (2017). Regional assessment of groundwater recharge in the Lower Mekong Basin. Hydrology, 4(4), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology4040060

Li, H., Li, H., Dong, G., Min, M., Si, B., Miao, C., Jin, J., Chen, G., & Feng, H. (2025). Rooting depth governs groundwater recharge in agroforestry systems: Implications for water sustainability under dryland afforestation. Journal of Hydrology, 662, 134072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134072

Malik, A., Shukla, J.P., & Khan, N. (2021). Groundwater potential zone mapping using remote sensing, GIS and analytical hierarchy process (AHP): A review. Environmental Earth Sciences, 80, 1–20. https.//doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100068

Municipality of Tamparan. (2020). Rehabilitation of Bangon and Lumbacaingud South Communal Irrigation System, Tamparan, Lanao del Sur: Initial environmental examination. Integrated Natural Resources and Environment Management (INREMP) Project. Prepared by the Municipality of Tamparan, Province of Lanao del Sur, for the Asian Development Bank.

Panondi, W., & Izumi, N. (2021). Climate change impact on the hydrologic regimes and sediment yield of Pulangi River Basin (PRB) for watershed sustainability. Sustainability, 13(16), Article 9041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169041

Price, K., Jackson, C.R., & Parker, A. (2010). Variation of surficial soil hydraulic properties across land uses in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains, North Carolina, USA. Journal of Hydrology, 383(3–4), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.041

Rawls, W.J., Brakensiek, D.L., & Saxton, K.E. (1982). Estimation of soil water properties. Transactions of the ASAE, 25(5), 1316–1320.

Santra, A., & Santra Mitra, S. (Eds.). (2017). Remote sensing techniques and GIS applications in earth and environmental studies. IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1814-3

Scanlon, B., Healy, R., & Cook, P. (2002). Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge. Hydrogeology Journal, 10(1),18–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-001-0176-2

Şener, E., Davraz, A., & Özçelik, M. (2005). An integration of GIS and remote sensing in groundwater investigations: A case study in Burdur, Turkey. Hydrogeology Journal, 13(5–6), 826–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0378-5

Shin, M.E., Campbell, J., & Burkhart, S. (2017). Essentials of geographic information systems (Version 2.1). FlatWorld.

Son, C.T., & Yadav, K.K. (2023). Unlocking the hidden potential: Groundwater zone mapping using AHP, remote sensing and GIS techniques. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2264458

Sophocleous, M., & Buchanan, R. (2003). Factors influencing recharge. Kansas Geological Survey. https://www.kgs.ku.edu/Publications/pic22/pic22_2.html

Sun, H., & Cornish, P.S. (2005). Estimating shallow groundwater recharge in the headwaters of the Liverpool Plains using SWAT. Hydrological Processes, 19(3), 795–807. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5617

Tsegaw, W.D., et al. (2025). Comparative groundwater potential mapping using AHP and FR methods in the Woleka River sub-basin, Ethiopia. Water Practice & Technology, 2025.

Todd, D.K., & Mays, L.W. (2005). Groundwater hydrology (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (1979). Map of the world distribution of arid regions: Map at scale 1:25,000,000 with explanatory note (MAB Technical Notes).

Vasileva, T. (2019). An assessment of potential groundwater recharge zones in Bulgaria. Geologica Balcanica, 48(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.52321/GeolBalc.48.1.43

Waindeshkar, P., Umrikar, B., Srujanika, S., & Shirke, A. (2025). Impact of land use changes on groundwater recharge in Deccan basaltic aquifers. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2025. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-5-W2-2025-719-2025

Yeh, H.-F., Lee, C.-H., Hsu, K.-C., & Chang, P.-H. (2008). GIS for the assessment of the groundwater recharge potential zone. Environmental Geology, 58(1), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1504-9

Yifru, B.A., Chung, I.-M., Kim, M.-G., & Chang, S.W. (2020). Assessment of groundwater recharge in agro-urban watersheds using integrated SWAT-MODFLOW model. Sustainability, 12(16), 6593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166593

Yıldırım, Ü. (2021). Identification of groundwater potential zones using GIS and multi-criteria decision-making techniques: A case study Upper Coruh River Basin (NE Turkey). ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(6), 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10060396

Downloads

Published

2026-09-16

How to Cite

Najeb, R., Panondi, W., Jali, S. S. Z., Galela, J., & Waradil, B. (2026). Groundwater Recharge Potential Mapping Using Hydrological Modeling and Remote Sensing in the Lake Lanao Catchment, Philippines. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 4(10), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.413