A Linguistic Analysis of Oral Reading Miscues and Difficulties Towards Designing an Innovative Reading Program

Authors

  • Ma. Teresa C. Martinez Graduate School, University of St. La Salle, Bacolod City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.440

Keywords:

Linguistic analysis, Oral reading miscues, Phonological and orthographic processing, Reading difficulties, Reading intervention program

Abstract

 Oral reading miscues reveal how learners coordinate sounds, printed forms, and meaning while reading. However, the linguistic processes underlying these miscues remain insufficiently examined among Filipino adolescent second-language readers. This sequential mixed-methods descriptive study with qualitative priority investigated the oral reading miscues and difficulties of Grade 7 struggling readers in a public secondary school. Of the 144 learners who met the eligibility criteria based on their Philippine Informal Reading Inventory Group Screening Test scores, 120 completed an audio-recorded oral reading assessment using a Grade 5 Phil-IRI passage. Frequencies, percentages, and rankings identified the three most prevalent miscue types and the five most frequently miscued words within each type. These words were examined according to their phonological, orthographic, and lexical features. Ten learners with the highest number of miscues participated in one-on-one interviews, and their responses were analyzed thematically. Integration occurred when the assessment results guided the selection of miscues, words, and interview participants, while the linguistic and interview findings were combined during interpretation. A total of 754 miscue instances were recorded. Mispronunciation was the most frequent at 51.33%, followed by repetition at 26.92% and substitution at 21.75%. Mispronunciations were associated with cross-linguistic phonological differences, complex consonant clusters, and weak phoneme-grapheme correspondence. Repetitions reflected irregular spelling patterns, incomplete orthographic mapping, and attempts at self-correction, while substitutions were linked to limited vocabulary, weak morphological awareness, and reliance on familiar lexical forms. Interviews further revealed difficulties in letter-sound recognition, word familiarity, and exposure to English vocabulary. The findings support Goodman’s view of reading as a meaning-making process and demonstrate how phonological, orthographic, and lexical constraints interact in producing oral reading miscues. The integrated findings informed a localized reading program designed to strengthen decoding accuracy, orthographic mapping, vocabulary knowledge, and oral reading confidence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abril, J.G., Acerbo, C.T., & Abocejo, F.T. (2022). The Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) program: A critical analysis. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 5(4), 432–441.

Alderete, J. (2023). Cross-linguistic trends in speech errors: An analysis of sub-lexical errors in Cantonese. Language and Speech, 66(1), 79–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211071045

Aldhanhani, Z., & Abu-Ayyash, E.A.S. (2020). Theories and research on oral reading fluency: What is needed? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(4), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1004.05

Ali, A.A., & Ghnee, M.R. (2023). An analysis of oral reading miscues for the English language and retelling comprehension of fifth preparatory graders in Thiqar, Iraq: A psycholinguistic study. Thi Qar Arts Journal, 1(44), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.32792/tqartj.v1i44.467

Al-Yami, E., & Al-Athwary, A.A.H. (2021). Phonological analysis of errors in the consonant cluster system encountered by Saudi EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(10), 1237–1248. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1110.11

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481

Canoy, D., & Loquias, A. (2022). Identifying reading miscues and reading performance in the oral reading verification test in English: Basis for an intensive reading program. International Journal of English Language Studies, 4(4), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2022.4.4.6

Casaljay, M.J.T., & Malabarbas, G.T. (2022). Oral reading miscues among Grade 11 students in a technical-vocational high school. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 2(7), 272–280.

Chen, Y.I., Cunningham, A., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Hinshaw, S., & Irey, R. (2019). The effect of orthographic neighbors on second-grade students’ spelling acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.291

Cofie, N., Braund, H., & Dalgarno, N. (2022). Eight ways to get a grip on intercoder reliability using qualitative-based measures. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.72504

Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

da Silva, C., & da Fonseca, B.V. (2021). Reading fluency performance of elementary-school fifth-grade students. Revista CEFAC, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20212368621

De Rom, M., & Van Reybroeck, M. (2024). Guessing errors made by children with dyslexia in word and text reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1195696

Dewi, N.L.D.S., Wardhana, I.G.N.P., & Awololon, Y.O.L. (2024). The influence of native language on young Indonesian learners’ ability to pronounce English short vowels. Santhet (Jurnal Sejarah Pendidikan Dan Humaniora), 8(2), 2729–2733. https://doi.org/10.36526/santhet.v8i2.4833

Dyani, A.P., Romadhoni, N.N., & Rohmana, W.I.M. (2025). Analysis of mispronunciation of the “th” sound by EFL learners at university level. PRASASTI: Journal of Linguistics, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.20961/prasasti.v10i1.96285

Ehri, L. (2020). The science of learning to read words: A case for systematic phonics instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S45–S60. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.334

Fernandes, S., Querido, L., & Verhaeghe, A. (2024). Learning to read in an intermediate depth orthography: The longitudinal role of grapheme sounding on different types of reading fluency. Behavioral Sciences, 14(5), 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050396

Fundano, R., & Fortes, A.C. (2025). Beyond errors: Interlanguage system of L2 learners and epistemological beliefs of L2 teachers. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 4(6), 2726–2751. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.906000201

Fusch, P., & Ness, L. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss9/3/

Giazitzidou, S., & Padeliadu, S. (2022). Contribution of morphological awareness to reading fluency of children with and without dyslexia: Evidence from a transparent orthography. Annals of Dyslexia, 72(3), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-022-00267-z

Goodman, K. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(4), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388076709556976

Grippando, S. (2021). Japanese orthographic complexity and speech duration in a reading task. Phonetica, 78(4), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2021-2008

Gussenhoven, C., & Jacobs, H. (2017). Understanding phonology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315267982

Jabbour-Danial, M., Share, D., & Shalhoub-Awwad, Y. (2024). Not just phonology: A longitudinal study of dyslexia subtypes based on the distinction between reading accuracy and reading rate. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2024.1390391

January, S.-A., & Klingbeil, D. (2020). Universal screening in grades K-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis of early reading curriculum-based measures. Journal of School Psychology, 82, 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.08.007

Lally, C., & Rastle, K. (2022). Orthographic and feature-level contributions to letter identification. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(5), 1111–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221106155

Laufer, B., & Vaisman, E.E. (2023). Out-of-classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: The effects of digital activities and school vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal, 107(4), 854–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12880

Lawshe, C.H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Leaño, A., Rabi, N.M., & Piragasam, G.A.G. (2019). Speaking difficulties of Philippine indigenous learners in English phonology. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 1231–1244. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i1/5786

Levesque, K., & Deacon, S.H. (2022). Clarifying links to literacy: How does morphological awareness support children’s word reading development? Applied Psycholinguistics, 43(4), 921–943. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716422000194

Macnamara, B., Moore, A., & Conway, A.R.A. (2011). Phonological similarity effects in simple and complex span tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39(6), 1174–1186. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0100-5

Marković, J., Brod, G., & Tetzlaff, L. (2024). The impact of orthographic knowledge on reading development in German third graders. Reading and Writing, 38(5), 1291–1308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10560-5

Marinelli, C.V., Romani, C., Burani, C., McGowan, V., & Zoccolotti, P. (2016). Costs and benefits of orthographic inconsistency in reading: Evidence from a cross-linguistic comparison. PLOS ONE, 11(6), e0157457. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157457

Maramag, M. (2022). Oral reading difficulties and reading behaviors of alternative learning system (ALS) learners. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 3(2), 102–120. https://www.ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/129

McElvenny, J. (2021). Language complexity in historical perspective: The enduring tropes of natural growth and abnormal contact. Frontiers in Communication, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.621712

Milledge, S., & Blythe, H. (2019). The changing role of phonology in reading development. Vision, 3(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision3020023

Nation, K. (2017). Nurturing a lexical legacy: Reading experience is critical for the development of word reading skill. NPJ Science of Learning, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0004-7

Nguyen, T., Pickren, S., Saha, N., & Cutting, L. (2020). Executive functions and components of oral reading fluency through the lens of text complexity. Reading and Writing, 33(4), 1037–1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10020-w

O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220

Palinkas, L., Horwitz, S., Green, C., Wisdom, J., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed-methods implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Pang, D., & Son, S. (2024). The relationship between morphological awareness and reading comprehension among early grade Chinese children with reading difficulties: A path analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 77, 102268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102268

Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687

Rasinski, T. (2014). Fluency matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 3–12. https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/60/58

Reig, C.A., Flores, D.A., Molinar, M., & Corazon, M. (2024). Errors and productivity on the English past tense among Filipino L2 English learners. Tamansiswa International Journal in Education and Science (TIJES), 6(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.30738/tijes.v6i1.18003

Reilhac, C., Jucla, M., Iannuzzi, S., Valdois, S., & Démonet, J.-F. (2012). Effect of orthographic processes on letter identity and letter-position encoding in dyslexic children. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00154

Rusu Mocănașu, D. (2020). Determining the sample size in qualitative research. International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on the Dialogue between Sciences & Arts, Religion & Education, 4(1), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.26520/mcdsare.2020.4.181-187

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

Setyawan, H. (2019). Undergraduates’ awareness of English irregular verbs. Teknosastik, 16(2), 66. https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v16i2.143

Shen, H., Zhou, Y., & Gao, G. (2020). Oral reading miscues and reading comprehension by Chinese L2 learners. Reading in a Foreign Language, 32(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/67378

Van der Kleij, S.W., Burgess, A.P., Ricketts, J., & Shapiro, L.R. (2022). Tracking vocabulary and reading growth in children from lower and higher socioeconomic backgrounds during the transition from primary to secondary education. Child Development, 94(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13862

Yang, X., Dulay, K.M., McBride, C., & Cheung, S.K. (2021). How do phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming, and vocabulary contribute to early numeracy and print knowledge of Filipino children? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 209, 105179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105179

Yeager, C.P., & Sandra, G. (2018). Investigating oral reading miscues produced by students with Down syndrome: A descriptive study. Journal of Down Syndrome & Chromosome Abnormalities, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1115.1000127

Zarić, J., Hasselhorn, M., & Nagler, T. (2021). Orthographic knowledge predicts reading and spelling skills over and above general intelligence and phonological awareness. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00464-7

Zhou, Y., Xie, R., Wu, X., Nguyen, T.P., Xia, Y., Yu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2023). The effects of phonological awareness and morphological awareness on reading comprehension in early elementary school children: The mediating role of reading fluency. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(6), 930. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.00930

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Martinez, M. T. (2026). A Linguistic Analysis of Oral Reading Miscues and Difficulties Towards Designing an Innovative Reading Program. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 4(10), 484–502. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.440