Perceived Barriers in Pursuing STEM Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.345Keywords:
Barriers to STEM participation, Gender differences, Psychological barriers, Senior high school students, STEM educationAbstract
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education plays a crucial role in developing the scientific and technological workforce needed for national and global development. Despite educational reforms and increased promotion of STEM programs, many students continue to encounter barriers that may affect their participation and persistence in STEM-related fields. This study aimed to determine the perceived barriers to pursuing STEM education among Grade 12 students and to examine whether significant differences in these barriers exist when grouped by sex. Specifically, the study investigated psychological, social, institutional, gender stereotype, and socioeconomic barriers. A quantitative descriptive-comparative research design was employed involving 263 Grade 12 students selected through stratified random sampling with proportionate allocation, followed by simple random sampling within each stratum. Data were collected using an adapted survey questionnaire and analyzed using the weighted mean and the independent samples t-test. Results revealed that psychological barriers were perceived at a high level, whereas social, institutional, gender stereotype, and socioeconomic barriers were perceived at low levels. Inferential analysis further indicated no statistically significant differences in perceived barriers between male and female students across all dimensions. These findings indicate that psychological factors are the primary challenge for students pursuing STEM education, whereas external barriers are generally perceived as less influential. These findings suggest that schools should prioritize interventions that strengthen students' self-efficacy, resilience, and confidence through mentoring, guidance, and socio-emotional support programs, as these approaches may have a greater impact on promoting STEM participation than interventions focused solely on external barriers.
Downloads
References
Chan, R. (2022). A social cognitive perspective on gender disparities in self-efficacy, interest, and aspirations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): The influence of cultural and gender norms. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00352-0
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S.A., Montoya, A.K., & Jiang, L. (2025). Global patterns of gender disparities in STEM and explanations for their persistence. Nature Reviews Psychology, 4, 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00380-3
Department of Education. (2016). Policy guidelines on daily lesson preparation for the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016). Department of Education. https://tinyurl.com/ytzpw8k2
Department of Science and Technology–Science Education Institute. (2023). Science and technology scholarship programs.
Elvira-Zorzo, M.N., Gandarillas, M.Á., & Martí-González, M. (2025). Psychosocial differences between female and male students in learning patterns and mental health-related indicators in STEM vs. non-STEM fields. Social Sciences, 14(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14020071
Flores, I., Robles, R., & Peñero, I. (2026). Profiling perceived challenges in Mathematics in the Modern World to inform Math-RetoKiSS: A data-informed blended learning support system for 21st-century mathematics learning in a Philippine university. Frontiers in Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1821795
Han, J., Kelley, T., & Knowles, J.G. (2021). Factors influencing student STEM learning: Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy, 21st century skills, and career awareness. Journal for STEM Education Research, 4(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-021-00053-3
Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. (2020). Cultural stereotypes and sense of belonging contribute to gender gaps in STEM. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 12(1), 152–198. ED605235.pdf
Miller, D., Lauer, J., Tanenbaum, C., & Burr, L. (2024). The development of children's gender stereotypes about STEM and verbal abilities: A preregistered meta-analytic review of 98 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 150(12), 1363–1396. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000456
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Pascual, E. (2026). Fostering academic motivation of senior high school learners through weekly written note ticket reflections. International Journal of Research Publications, 191(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1001911220268696
Rogayan, D.V., Jr., Rafanan, R.J.L., & de Guzman, C.Y. (2021). Challenges in STEM learning: A case of Filipino high school students. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 7(2), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v7i2.11293
Saw, G. (2020). Leveraging social capital to broaden participation in STEM. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219895997
Santiago, C., & Soliven, S. (2024). Investigating STEM senior high school scientific research productivity and selected affecting factors: A mixed triangulation study. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v10i3p1
Turner, S., Gonzalez, J.E., Wong, E.H., & Wood, J.L. (2024). Barriers to STEM efficacy and outcome expectations among Native American college students. The Career Development Quarterly, 72(1), 3 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000221108454
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? https://unesdoc.unesco.org
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
JIP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Under the Open Access Policy, appropriate attribution can be provided by simply citing the original article.

