Profiling At-Risk Student Characteristics Associated with Mandatory Programmatic Divergence in Licensure-Based Programs at a Private University

Authors

  • Danmart N. Sarsua College of Business, Graduate School, University of San Agustin, Iloilo City, Philippines
  • Antonio J. Junio College of Business, Graduate School, University of San Agustin, Iloilo City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.299

Keywords:

At-risk students, Early warning system, Licensure-based programs, Mandatory programmatic divergence, Student attrition

Abstract

Student attrition remains a major concern in higher education, particularly in licensure-based programs with rigorous academic standards and retention policies. This study aimed to statistically profile at-risk students associated with mandatory programmatic divergence and provide baseline evidence for the development of institutional retention initiatives and an Early Warning System. The study was conducted at the study institution using a descriptive cross-sectional quantitative research design that combined secondary institutional records and primary survey responses. A total of 220 undergraduate students identified as at risk of mandatory programmatic divergence were selected through proportionate stratified random sampling. The study examined socio-demographic attributes, academic background, institutional retention indicators, and attrition-related factors categorized into academic, financial, and personal-social dimensions. Data were analyzed using frequency counts, percentages, means, standard deviations, the Mann–Whitney U test, and the Kruskal–Wallis H test. The findings showed that most at-risk students were female, belonged to the middle-income group, and were enrolled in the second and third year levels. Academic factors (M = 3.42, SD = 0.88) and personal-social factors (M = 3.46, SD = 0.65) were rated as Frequently Occurred, whereas financial factors (M = 3.08, SD = 1.18) were rated as Sometimes Occurred. Significant differences in academic background were observed across sex, income level, previous course, and present course, while institutional retention indicators differed significantly according to year level. The findings provide a statistical profile of at-risk students in licensure-based programs and offer baseline evidence that may inform institutional retention strategies, student support initiatives, and the future development of an Early Warning System.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bañeres, D., Rodríguez, M. E., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Karadeniz, A. (2020). An early warning system to detect at-risk students in online higher education. Applied Sciences, 10(13), 4427. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134427

Bañeres, D., Rodríguez-González, M. E., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Cortadas Guasch, P. (2023). An early warning system to identify and intervene online dropout learners. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00371-5

Bean, J. P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12(2), 155–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976194

Bean, J. P., & Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55(4), 485–540. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543055004485

Berka, P., & Marek, L. (2021). Bachelor's degree student dropouts: Who tend to stay and who tend to leave? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 100999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100999

Dai, W., Lin, J., Jin, F. J.-Y., Tsai, Y.-S., Srivastava, N., Le Bodic, P., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2025). Learning analytics for early identification of at-risk students and feedback intervention. Journal of Learning Analytics, 12(3), 102–125. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2025.8735

Foster, E., & Siddle, R. (2020). The effectiveness of learning analytics for identifying at-risk students in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(6), 842–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1682118

Good, C. V., & Scates, D. E. (1972). Methods of Research: Educational, Psychological, Sociological. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Goren, O., Cohen, L., & Rubinstein, A. (2024). Early prediction of student dropout in higher education using machine learning models. Proceedings of the International Educational Data Mining Conference (EDM 2024). Educational Data Mining Society.

Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Schmitz, M., Robbers, S., Specht, M. M., & Drachsler, H. J. (2020). From students with love: An empirical study on learner goals, self-regulated learning and sense-making of learning analytics in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 47, 100758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100758

Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., & Mirriahi, N. (2021). Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 49, 100789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100789

Mduma, N., Kalegele, K., & Machuve, D. (2023). A machine learning approach for student dropout prediction using imbalanced educational datasets. Scientific African, 19, e01581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01581

Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Jossey-Bass.

Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Vaarma, M., & Li, H. (2024). Predicting student dropouts with machine learning: An empirical study in Finnish higher education. Technology in Society, 76, 102474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102474

Downloads

Published

2026-08-27

How to Cite

Sarsua, D., & Junio, A. (2026). Profiling At-Risk Student Characteristics Associated with Mandatory Programmatic Divergence in Licensure-Based Programs at a Private University. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 4(9), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.299