Basic Sight Word Recognition Exercises and Learners’ Reading Comprehension

Authors

  • Vince Kenneth G. Ahat Cebu Sacred Heart College-Bohol Campus, Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines
  • Sheila Mae Bucio Napo Elementary School, Napo, Alicia, Bohol, Philippines
  • Michelle T. Palmero Montessori Educational Learning Center of Ubay Inc., Highway Tapon, Ubay, Bohol, Philippines
  • Alma L. Morales Lombog Elementary School, Lombog, Guindulman, Bohol, Philippines
  • Weena Mae G. Ampo Bohol Island State University, Tagbilaran, Bohol, Philippines
  • Leo H. Malalis Tambis Elementary School, Bohol, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.209

Keywords:

Reading comprehension, Reading instruction, Sight word recognition, Word recognition, Literacy development

Abstract

Reading comprehension is a fundamental component of literacy development; however, many learners continue to experience difficulties due to insufficient mastery of foundational skills such as sight-word recognition. Despite the widespread use of basic sight-word recognition exercises in early-grade instruction, limited empirical evidence exists regarding their implementation and learners’ reading comprehension in localized contexts. This study examined basic sight-word recognition exercises and learners’ reading comprehension in selected public elementary schools in Alicia District, Bohol, Philippines. A quantitative descriptive research design was employed, involving 269 respondents composed of 52 teachers and 217 learners from Grades 4 to 6. Data were gathered using a validated 16-item teacher questionnaire adapted from Lyon (2020; Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92) and the Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) to assess learners’ reading comprehension. Weighted mean and percentage distribution were used for data analysis. Findings revealed that basic sight-word recognition exercises were widely practiced among teachers, with a composite mean of 3.59. Moreover, most learners were classified as independent readers (54.38%), followed by Instructional readers (43.78%) and Frustration readers (1.84%). The findings suggest that teachers consistently implement sight word recognition exercises, while most learners demonstrate independent reading comprehension levels. Based on the results, it is recommended that teachers continue integrating structured sight-word activities into reading instruction to further support literacy development in their classrooms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alacida, C., Asas, M., Aparilla, G., Bernacer, J.G., Butihen, J., Hingpit, C., Monares, M.G., Vallentos, M., & Ampo, W.M. (2025). Exploring academic decline among e-gamers: A phenomenological approach to learners’ academic experiences. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 48(8), 1267–1272. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.480806

Aliyar, M., & Peters, E. (2022). Incidental acquisition of Italian words from comic books. Reading in a Foreign Language, 34(2), 349–377. https://tinyurl.com/4kwh3ydv

Aratea, M., Placido, C.A., Amarille, D.H., & Tiu, A.M. (2023). Relationship of vocabulary mastery and reading comprehension of students. International Journal of Academic Research. https://tinyurl.com/2ss2c88x

Balnig, B., Guibone, L.J., & Alda, R. (2024). The relationship between reading fluency components and comprehension skills: A descriptive correlational study. Journal of Education and Innovation. https://tinyurl.com/2jcvck9p

Boucher, A., Bhat, B., Clemens, N., Vaughn, S., & O’Donnell, K. (2024). Reading interventions for students in Grades 3–12 with significant word reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 57(4), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194231207556

Denton, C., Montroy, J., Zucker, T., & Cannon, G. (2021). Designing an intervention in reading and self-regulation for students with significant reading difficulties, including dyslexia. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(3), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948719899479

de Oliveira, A.M., Santos, J.L.F., & Capellini, S.A. (2023). Reading comprehension performance of elementary and senior high school students. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1086040

Donegan, R., & Wanzek, J. (2021). Effects of reading interventions implemented for upper elementary struggling readers: A look at recent research. Reading and Writing, 34(8), 1943–1977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10123-y

Ehri, L. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356

Hall, C., Dahl-Leonard, K., Cho, E., Solari, E., Capin, P., Conner, C., Henry, A., Cook, L., Hayes, L., Vargas, I., Richmond, C., & Kehoe, K. (2023). Forty years of reading intervention research for elementary students with or at risk for dyslexia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(2), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.477

Khosa, M. (2025). The effects of a print-rich literacy environment on developing early reading skills in the foundation phase classroom. Reading Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2024.2447243

Leachman, M., Wolters, A., & Kim, Y.-S. G. (2025). The relation between text reading and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000932

Lusaran, C.J., Lusica, T., Mantica, R., Olasiman, K., Pelenio, M., Jr., Pintac, J., Timario, M., & Ampo, W.M. (2026). Status of learners in numeracy and reading literacy: Examining their performance and challenges with words and numbers. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 4(2), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.774

Mahfouz, M.A.S., & Mohamed, A.H.H. (2023). Using word reading fluency curriculum-based measurements to monitor students’ reading progress in Grade 2. Education Sciences, 13(2), 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020217

Metsala, J. (2023). Longitudinal contributions of morphological awareness, listening comprehension, and gains in word reading fluency to later word- and text-reading fluency. Front. Educ. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1194879

Purnomo, J.S., & Royanto, L. (2025). Effective reading interventions for slow learners: Sight word and phonemic awareness approaches. Jurnal Paedagogy. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v12i1.13250

Quintano, C., Esto, J., & Sumayo, G. (2025). Reading practices and reading environments among Grade 6 pupils in a public elementary school. International Journal of Philosophy, Linguistics, and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.70847/592961

Waldmann, C., & Levlin, M. (2024). Reading profiles in secondary school: Concurrent language and cognitive abilities, and retrospective and prospective reading skills. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1287134

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Ahat, V. K., Bucio, S. M., Palmero, M., Morales, A., Ampo, W. M., & Malalis, L. (2026). Basic Sight Word Recognition Exercises and Learners’ Reading Comprehension. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 4(7), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.209

Most read articles by the same author(s)