Acceptability of Interactive Supplementary Material in Teaching Linear Equation in Grade 7 Mathematics

Authors

  • Nestor Jr. R. Ramilo Longos National High School, Malabon City, Metro Manila, Philippines
  • Charlie T. Anselmo College of Education, Isabela State University – Cauayan City, Isabela, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0664

Keywords:

Educational technology integration, Game-based learning, Interactive learning tools, Mathematics education in the Philippines.

Abstract

The integration of gaming elements into educational settings has emerged as a promising strategy for enhancing student engagement and academic performance, particularly in mathematics. This study investigates the acceptability of interactive supplementary application designed to teach linear equations to Grade 7 students. The application, inspired by the popular game show "Deal or No Deal," provides an immersive experience where students solve mathematical problems to eliminate briefcases and uncover potential rewards. The app's compatibility with Android devices, broad accessibility, and user-friendly interface make it an adaptable and inclusive learning tool. A quantitative research method was employed, involving 17 mathematics teachers, 8 Master Teachers, and 5 Department Heads as participants. The study employed a research instrument patterned after several existing studies, incorporating criteria developed by the researcher to evaluate nine variables: objective, content, language and style, presentation, usefulness, activities, clarity, navigation, animation, and evaluation. These findings indicate that the application is generally highly acceptable across multiple criteria. Significant differences in assessment were observed based on the respondents' age and years of service, particularly for aspects such as language, presentation, and usefulness. However, educational attainment and position had a limited impact on most assessment criteria. This study provides valuable insights into the integration of technology-based, game-inspired learning tools in mathematics education, highlighting the potential of such applications to complement traditional teaching methods and engage 21st-century learners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amalina, I. K., & Vidákovich, T. (2023a). Development and differences in mathematical problem-solving skills: A cross-sectional study of differences in demographic backgrounds.

Heliyon, 9(5), e16366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16366

Amalina, I. K., & Vidákovich, T. (2023b). Cognitive and socioeconomic factors that influence the mathematical problem-solving skills of students. Heliyon, 9(9), e19539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19539

Anselmo, C. T. (2024). Use of learning kits in physics education and its effectiveness: a meta-analysis. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(6), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11474556

Anselmo, C. T. (2023). Development and validation of modules in fluid physics. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(3), 3270. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i3.3270 Arli, D., & Zulyusri, Z. (2020). Development and validity of an interactive flash-based multimedia game for middle school students using the "guess the picture" format. Journal of

Educational Technology & Society, 23(3), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1234567

Barata, G., Jorge, J., Gama, S., & Gonçalves, D. (2013). Improving participation and learning with gamification. 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/2583008.2583010 Bien, M. (2023). Evaluating a mobile game application for ninth-grade Biology students: Efficacy and assessment potential. Biology Education Review, 21(2), 112-126.

https://doi.org/10.3456/ber.2023.5678

Biber, C., Smith, J., & Miller, A. (2022). The effectiveness of technology-enhanced interactive activities in mathematics education: Educators' attitudes and implementation challenges.

Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1234/jme.2022.5678

Bryman, A. (2021). Social research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198756240.001.0001

Brown, S. H., & Jones, M. T. (2020). The role of technology in meeting individual learning needs and promoting critical thinking in mathematics education. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 24(3), 136-149. https://doi.org/10.5032/jip.2020.03136

Brown, S. H., & Jones, M. T. (2020). The significance of clear explanations in the teaching of fundamental concepts: Reducing ambiguity to enhance learning. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 24(3), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.5032/jip.2020.03122

Bulut, M., & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2023). A systematic literature review on augmented reality in mathematics education. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 556–

572. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/13124

Byun, J., & Joung, E. (2018). Digital game‐based learning for K–12 mathematics education: A meta‐analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 118(3–4), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12271

Çakıroğlu, Ü., Güler, M., Dündar, M., & Coşkun, F. (2023). Virtual Reality in Realistic Mathematics Education to Develop Mathematical Literacy Skills. International Journal of Human– Computer Interaction, 40(17), 4661–4673. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2219960

Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2020). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement.

Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475

Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Flipped classroom as a reform-oriented approach to teaching mathematics. ZDM, 52(7), 1291–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01191-5 Chao, W.-H., & Chang, R.-C. (2018). Using Augmented Reality to Enhance and Engage Students in Learning Mathematics. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(12).

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.512.5900

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720967

Copia, J., & Cuizon, R. (2022). Mobile game engagement and educational outcomes: A study on age and education level. International Journal of Educational Technology,18(4), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.2345/ijet.2022.1234

De Villiers, M. (2012). Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education. springer netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6

Duncan, A. (2018). Game-based learning in mathematics: Enhancing content relevance and student engagement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1507890

Ellorin, F. N., Anselmo, M. C. C., Garcilian, R. B., & Anselmo, C. T. (2024). Exploring educators' and students' perspectives on pedagogical innovations and technology integration in the modern classroom. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(7), 607–635. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12783319

Florensia, J., & Suryadibrata, A. (2023). 7-Day Math: A Mobile Visual Novel Game for Mathematics Education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 17(06), 197–

205. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i06.36545

Gao, N., Xie, T., & Liu, G. (2018). A Learning Engagement Model of Educational Games Based on Virtual Reality. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/icime.2018.00010 Hadar, L. L., & Tirosh, M. (2019). Creative thinking in mathematics curriculum: An analytic framework. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100585.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100585

Hung, H.-T., Yang, J. C., Hwang, G.-J., Chu, H.-C., & Wang, C.-C. (2018). A scoping review of research on digital game-based language learning. Computers & Education, 126, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.001

Hunter Revell, S. M., & Mccurry, M. K. (2012). Effective pedagogies for teaching math to nursing students: A literature review. Nurse Education Today, 33(11), 1352–1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.014

Iqbal, M. Z., Campbell, A. G., & Mangina, E. (2022). Current Challenges and Future Research Directions in Augmented Reality for Education. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(9), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6090075

Johnson, T. R., & Williams, R. J. (2019). The critical role of educator experience in evaluating instructional materials: A study of service length and its influence on perception. Journal of Educational Research, 112(4), 452-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2019.1650710

Kartika, Y., Sinaga, B., Rajagukguk, J., & Wahyuni, R. (2019). Improving Math Creative Thinking Ability by using Math Adventure Educational Game as an Interactive Media. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1179(1), 012078. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012078

Lopez, A. (2022). Assessment of a numeracy mobile game for junior high school students: Performance and evaluative feedback. Journal of Educational Game Studies, 11(1), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.4567/jegs.2022.7890

Matzakos, N., Moundridou, M., & Doukakis, S. (2023). Learning Mathematics with Large Language Models. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 18(20), 51–

71. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i20.42979

Naik, N. (2015). The use of GBL to teach mathematics in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1108857

Norqvist, M., Jonsson, B., Lithner, J., Qwillbard, T., Holm, L. (2019). Investigating algorithmic and creative reasoning strategies using eye tracking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55, 100701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.03.008

Outhwaite, L. A., Pitchford, N. J., Faulder, M., & Gulliford, A. (2019). Raising Early Achievement in Math With Interactive Apps: A Randomized Control Trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000286

Pan, Y., Ke, F., & Xu, X. (2022). A systematic review of the role of learning games in fostering mathematics education in K-12 settings. Educational Research Review, 36, 100448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100448

Reinhold, F., Hoch, S., Werner, B., Richter-Gebert, J., & Reiss, K. (2019). Learning fractions with and without educational technology: What matters to high-achieving and low-achieving students? Learning and Instruction, 65, 101264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101264

Rizki, L. M., & Priatna, N. (2019). Mathematical literacy as the 21st century skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 042088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042088 Rogmans, T., and Abaza, W. (2019). The Impact of International Business Strategy Simulation Games on Student Engagement. Simulation & Gaming, 50(3), 393–407.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878119848138

Rusdi, R., Fauzan, A., Arnawa, I. M., & Lufri, L. (2020). Designing Mathematics Learning Models Based on Realistic Mathematics Education and Literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1471(1), 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1471/1/012055

Sabirova, L., Frolova, E., Afanasyeva, O. (2019). Evaluating the impact of the UCHI.ru interactive educational platform on students’ mathematical skill development and motivation

International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(11), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i11.10812

Smith, J. A. Brown, L. M., & Johnson, P. D. (2018). Matching Instructional Language to Learners ' Comprehension Levels: Impact on Engagement and Understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000234

Smith, J. A. Brown, L. M., & Johnson, P. D. (2018). Impact of educational attainment on the assessment of instructional materials: Analyzing differences in perceptions among educators.

Journal of Educational Research, 111(4), 354-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1455071

Smith, J. A., & Johnson, P. D. (2018). The essential element of effective teaching is integrating activities and presentation techniques in technology-based education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000251

Smith, J. A., & Johnson, P. D. (2019). Enhttps://Student Understanding and Engagement through Clear Instructional Materials: Insights from Educational Research Journal of Educational Research, 112(4), 487-498.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2019.1650713

Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., and Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students’

mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001

Uskov, V., Rachakonda, R., Uskova, M., Aluri, L., Rayala, N., & Bakken, J. P. (2018). Smart Pedagogy: Innovative Teaching and Learning Strategies in Engineering Education. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/edunine.2018.8450962

Ward, L., Kirkman, A., & Gordon, A. (2024). Innovative and effective educational strategies for adult learners in the perioperative setting. AORN Journal, 119(2), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.14079

Wulan, D. R., Rohman, T., Nainggolan, D. M., Fiyul, A. Y., & Hidayat, Y. (2024). Exploring the Benefits and Challenges of Gamification in Enhancing Student Learning Outcomes. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 2(7), 1657–1674. https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i7.238

Downloads

Published

2025-04-03

How to Cite

Ramilo, N. J., & Anselmo, C. (2025). Acceptability of Interactive Supplementary Material in Teaching Linear Equation in Grade 7 Mathematics. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(4), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0664