Artificial Intelligence Dependency as a Predictor of Perceived Reading Comprehension Barriers Among Senior High School Students in the Philippines

Authors

  • Michael P. Sugot Assumption College of Davao, Agdao, Davao City, Philippines
  • Eljane A. Masito Assumption College of Davao, Agdao, Davao City, Philippines
  • Rosell Ann S. Ponce Assumption College of Davao, Agdao, Davao City, Philippines
  • Roseann Mae S. Alcon Assumption College of Davao, Agdao, Davao City, Philippines
  • Maria Liza A. Baldonado Assumption College of Davao, Agdao, Davao City, Philippines
  • John Paul T. Wong Assumption College of Davao, Agdao, Davao City, Philippines
  • Edwin A. Acain Assumption College of Davao, Agdao, Davao City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.446

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence dependency, Perceived reading comprehension barriers, Senior high school students, Philippines, SDG 4

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) dependency and perceived reading comprehension barriers among senior high school students in the Philippines. Although AI tools are increasingly used for academic tasks, empirical evidence on whether dependency is associated with students’ perceived reading-related difficulties remains limited, particularly in the Philippine senior high school context. This study used a quantitative, non-experimental correlational-predictive design with 319 students. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, Pearson’s r, and simple linear regression. AI dependency in reading, writing, and numeracy was moderate (M = 3.20, SD = 0.66). Perceived reading comprehension barriers were also moderate (M = 3.16, SD = 0.78). AI dependency was positively and significantly associated with perceived reading comprehension barriers, r = .58, p < .001. Regression analysis showed that AI dependency significantly predicted perceived barriers, B = 0.68, β = .58, t(317) = 12.68, p < .001, R² = .34, indicating that AI dependency accounted for 33.6% of the variance in the outcome. The finding should not be interpreted causally and does not indicate improved reading performance because no objective comprehension test was administered. The results highlight the need for guided AI use, explicit reading-strategy instruction, and further research using objective comprehension measures and longitudinal or experimental designs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcı, Ö., & Mariman, R. (2025). Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(26), e2422633122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122

Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2021). Introduction to the special issue: Integration: The keystone of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 58(1), 1–4.

Capinding, A.T. (2024). Students’ AI dependency in 3R’s: Questionnaire construction and validation. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(11), 1532–1543. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.11.2184

De Oliveira, A.M., Santos, J.L.F., & Capellini, S.A. (2023). Reading comprehension performance of elementary and senior high school students. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1086040. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1086040

Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2025). Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers & Education, 227, 105224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224

Duke, N., Ward, A., & Pearson, P.D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993

Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570.

Kandisa, J., Nazri, M.A., Agustina, Y., & Prasetyaningrum, A. (2025). The relationship between vocabulary and reading comprehension of senior high school students. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(5).

Li, H., & Gan, Z. (2022). Reading motivation, self-regulated reading strategies and English vocabulary knowledge: Which most predicted students’ English reading comprehension? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1041870. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041870

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II): Country notes—Philippines. https://tinyurl.com/55xyddrd

Philippine Health Research Ethics Board. (2017). National ethical guidelines for health and health-related research 2017. Philippine Council for Health Research and Development.

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2025a, April 4). For every 10 Filipinos, 9 have basic literacy, while 7 have functional literacy.

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2025b, August 1). For every 10 Davaoeños aged 10–64 years old, 9 have basic literacy, while 6 out of 9 have functional literacy. https://tinyurl.com/mt7ff485

Pondang, K., Clarito, P.J., Camino, J., Flores, J.C., Deguiñon, M., Llorando, T.M., Otero, A., & Fostanes, S.M. (2025). AI application dependency and comprehension skills of Humanities and Social Sciences students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 10(2), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.1002005

Tambis, D.J., Panis, D., Mocorro, K.V., Gozon, M., & Diadula, J. (2023). Assessment of reading comprehension skills of Senior High School ALS learners: Basis for school reading progress program. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(7), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230708

Tian, J., & Zhang, R. (2025). Learners’ AI dependence and critical thinking: The psychological mechanism of fatigue and the social buffering role of AI literacy. Acta Psychologica, 260, 105725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105725

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, H.H., & Hung, L.Y. (2025). Exploring sources of reading comprehension difficulties among adolescents in Taiwan: A latent profile analysis with a focus on content-area reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 75(1), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-024-00319-6

Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7

Zheng, S. (2024). The effects of chatbot use on foreign language reading anxiety and reading performance among Chinese secondary school students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100271

Downloads

Published

2026-10-14

How to Cite

Sugot, M., Masito, E., Ponce, R. A., Alcon, R. M., Baldonado, M. L., Wong, J. P., & Acain, E. (2026). Artificial Intelligence Dependency as a Predictor of Perceived Reading Comprehension Barriers Among Senior High School Students in the Philippines. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 4(11), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2026.446